Maori Kingdom News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

THE “CONVERSATION” demanded on the meaning of the Treaty of Waitangi is likely to be short. Not because there is no need for a national debate on how Maori and Pakeha should live together in the twenty-first century, but because the current defenders of
te Tiriti (as it is now advisable to call the Maori translation of Captain Hobson’s document) will be unable to present a convincing defence for their ahistorical interpretation of its undertakings.
The reason for this incapacity is a simple one. To make their proposed solutions work, the whole history of New Zealand subsequent to the signing of the Treaty must be set to one side, and New Zealanders living in 2021 must proceed as if they are living in 1840. This is necessary because in no other way can the terms employed to translate the English of the Treaty into the Maori of ....

New Zealand , United Kingdom , New Zealand General , New Zealanders , Jock Brookfield , Tiritio Waitangi , Emily Beausoleil , Maori King Movement , Political Science At Victoria University , Colonial Office , Zealand Company , Captain Hobson , Political Science , Victoria University , Waitangi Tribunal , New Zealand Constitution Act , New Zealand Company , Maori Kingdom , Professor Jock Brookfield , New Zealand State , United Nations Declaration , Indigenous Peoples , புதியது ஜீலாந்து , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , ம Ori ரி , புதியது ஜீலாந்து ஜநரல் ,