worse and the whistle-blower and the people who express their concerns around him are spies that we would have had meet a dark fate back in the days when america was great. the problem is what this president and his followers accuse biden of without proof is actually present in what this president did and we have proof. you can t use words like coverup and abuse of power without making a very strong case of the same. remember that. this phone call is not enough. it s a window into a wild episode, but one that was months in the making. that will take time to show. democrats have to overcome the political problem that they ve been saying they had enough to impeach before this. they don t want to talk about it anymore. what about the other stuff? does it matter anymore? this can t just be about how the president basis either. it can t just be not liking what he s about. it has to be about overwhelming proof that he abused his office and enlisted the help of so many
because he says that there are legal experts who say sometimes it s okay. do you know of any case where it s okay? well, you know, in the mueller report, they got concerned about whether some of the activities qualified under the particulars of the statute because they had a hard time putting a value on opposition research. and that s why i m saying, like, with respect to the president, forget all the other people, forget the statues, it s the question of whether he violated his duties and responsibilities under the constitution. it just lets you know what you re dealing with here in terms of partisanship about how far people will go on one side to justify being against this analysis. but at the same time, that side feels that the left is going way too far in making this happen. the idea of the storage of the information, andrew, that this would have been put into a different password-protected directory, the congressman referred to it as another computer. it s not another comput
the standard of impeachment. yes. and obviously we ll have to wait until you have everything in front you have that you feel confident to make that case. congresswoman, thank you so much. such an important night. delighted to be here. you always have an invitation on this show in these important times to explain to the american people what s going on and why. i appreciate that. and thank you for having me this evening. pleasure. be well. thank you. all right, now, ahead, clearly, the democrats have a tall task, and it s made all the tougher by the fact that the other side of the aisle could not be more opposed to their efforts. we saw that today. we have a republican who questioned the president s acting dni in that hearing this morning. you have to hear what the democrats are up against. next. at fidelity, we believe your money
against the president and him after his outbursts and his making of that case. jim, thank you very much. andrew, as always. appreciate it, fellas. democrats are hovering at the threshold number of votes for articles of impeachment already. but what about the holdouts? we have one. congressman connor lamb from pennsylvania. what did he think of today? what does he need to do? what does he need to see to get anywhere near impeachment? find out next. man: i ve been diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration, which could lead to vision loss. so today i made a plan with my doctor, which includes preservision. because it s my vision, my love of the game, my open road, my little artist. vo: only preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute
circumstances? none. no, you can t. you should not be able to. yeah, none. exactly. because he says there tha there are legal experts who say sometimes it s okay. do you know of any case where it s okay? well, you know, in the mueller report they got concerned about whether some of the activities qualified under the particulars of the statute because they had a hard time putting a value on opposition research. and that s why i m saying like with respect to the president, forget all the other people, forget the statutes, it s the question is whether he violated his duties and responsibilities under the constitution. it just lets you know what you re dealing with here in terms of partisanship about how far people will go on one side to justify being against this analysis. but at the same time that side feels that the left is going way too far in making this happen. the idea of the storage of the information, andrew, that this would have been put into a different password-protec