Right now, ambassador lighthizer is on his way which is why it is so curious to see the story being put out by the chinese, the wall street journal, you cant reach him at this very moment but, yes and this is important because both Speaker Pelosi came on mad money, this is a done deal, once you finish the articles of impeachment and the president wants this deal, talk about david during the break, but it is the one thing people seem to agree on in washington this is a good deal. And yet the a lot of the people i follow who are you get a democrat in the white house and companies are allowed to move back south again it not that adventurous to do so because of the big increase in wages. Those of us who do business in mexico can tell you the differential is not just cash. But it is also healthcare, where they have universal healthcare and this is a story about pollution control. Where both sides are now saying both democrat and republican, there may be some enforcement, plus control rules.
Million and state and local owe if pishls can regroup hand in hand there is a innovations that could make elections more second tour. This week, you have your end all. Im wondering if you can talk about what areas you think there might be a hans for democrats and republicans to agree on. This is my bi this is my bill. And one democrat is against just like they have and they didnt and unfortunately, they didnt have and that makes it work for us. And they have failed to move insecuring our election. Were ways bipartisan. And youre saying that that wasnt the case . No. What democrats want to do, i think colleagues probably would are supported. And ask that is the last time and claimed yun. This is critical and it kind of how would democrats be backed by democrats. And they can protect us. And i dont ask anyone to be hell accountable and democrats wont allow that to happen. One portion of the bill i think every one was appalled by is theyre going to allow the doj to set the records state s
Republicans, 2027488001. Independents, 2027488002. You can post on twitter at cspanwj and you can also post on our Facebook Page at facebook. Com cspan. Money needed to run for a campaign, the website investor pdf investipedia provides historical context. 192 million dollars, 300 million in inflationadjusted dollars. George w. Bush spent 345 million, which at the time was the most Expensive Campaign in history. President obama spent 775. 4 285on and the dnc added million, making the total spent to reelect the president 985 million. Then it goes forward to 2016, adding that at the time, many estimates for the president ial election said it would cost 3 billion and some put it at 10 billion. Just to the cost of running a campaign. To the length, a story in 2016 on how campaigning became a two year event. It goes back to the time of john f. Kennedy saying he announced his candidacy january 2 1960. 11 months later between martha h march 8 and june 20 iowa move the caucuses to january in pa
There is a commercial complex in the west of tehran that has been built with bank money, this was done by one of the private banks that created a lot of money , there was a violation and it should have been dealt with. These violations according to the law. In the annual budget, which should allocate this amount of macro analysis to the production in the country , we made a legislative issue, which is being recorded in the budget of last year and this year as the third year, and it is interesting that when the commission principle 90 of each course is added to the budget layer while it has Many Blessings in its own country , its own government removed it again in the following years law , this shows the heavy lobbying of the banks regarding this legal issue. What does that paragraph say, it provides the transparency of big banking communications and provides tools for the central bank. Why does the government come again and remove this in its own law . We are putting this tool at the s
Some faith providers from kenya on the subject of Family Planning. So i think it is true what the first panel really emphasizes, that things are evolving and developing and this is an important moment to be exploring this further. And with this panel were eager to talk about it from the focus of the u. S. Policy perspective. And i think to begin with well turn to sandy thurman. Given your long involvement with hiv policy from the u. S. Government can you describe to us more about how pep far began partners with faithbased organizations and how that has evolved. Sure. Thank you. And thank you all for being here. It is interesting, the Faith Community has been a partner in response to hiv since the beginning of the epidemic both domestically and globally. So i think pet far was an out growth with faithbased organizations on the domestic side for a number of years. When we really began looking at the disproportionate impact of the epidemic in africa back in the late 1990s and early 2000,