not intervene. the judge seemed not to buy his lawyer s argument that there was, quote, no legislative purpose to the request replying january 6th happened at the capitol, literally, congress s house. and are you really saying the president s notes talking points have no bearing on the investigation? as it tries to piece it all together the committee listens to more voices behind closed. liz cheney telling politico they have completed over 150 interviews with a whole range of people connected to the events, connected to understanding what happened. that just gives you a sense it is a range of engagement, some formal interviews, some depositions, there really is a large amount of work under way. john eastman, of whom we learned even more stunning details this week, what he was planning before, during, even after the
that was big, alicia, because trump s papers have made that his number one argument especially as they have gone on because it is his big hope. once he loses that, his claims are weaker, still, because biden says i am not going to assert it. he has come out of the box saying no legislative purpose, congress can t do law enforcement. that s why incidentally when congress people come on your show they say we are doing this for a legislative reason, there may be a law down the line. what do i expect? she is focused on the time line. she gave a quick schedule. i expect her to rule quickly, by, say, tomorrow. then it goes up to the court of appeals if she denies trump s motion to sort of stop the music. i believe she will, though she has indicated she may narrow the subpoena a bit that could happen. then it s in the court of
because women are fleeing to other states. women of color cannot afford to do so in many instances so their death rate, it s suggested that it was going up because of the lack of ability for healthcare, but the idea of a fugitive slave law and a bounty is egregious and threatening and that s what that doctor was saying. every day she s under threat. so my position is this. one, the congress has to act. you criminalize and stop the stalkers in their tracks. and as well, the supreme court has to stop hiding behind standing. i hope their decision will ultimately come that the case can go forward in the lower court that the mississippi case is patently unconstitutional under roe v. wade but also under the constitution unconstitutional under the ninth amendment, which i read in the hearing today. you cannot interfere with rights that are not given to the government. and that means that the ninth amendment is constitutional. your rights are constitutional. your right to privacy. they are w
way. d.o.j. of course is in a completed spot here. the justice department doesn t like getting mixed up in things that are as politically charged as this matter. but if this judge comes out and satisfies that trump does not have the ability to assert executive privilege and that congress does have the right to demand these documents so that the legislative branch can do its job, then that just makes it all the more difficult for d.o.j. to not bring charges against bannon. harry, there was also reporting in the washington post yesterday showing a whole other reason trump doesn t qualify for executive privilege. the post reports, more than $225,000 in campaign payments to firms owned by karrick and giuliani, including more than $50,000 for rooms and suites at the posh willard hotel in washington had served as a command service for efforts to denied by ten presidency in the attacks leading up to the attack on the capitol on january 6th. how could this personal matter
it s like to have violent people stalking me, because that is actually my life every single day as an abortion provider in texas. i am followed into my job. i am screamed at. my child is screamed at by people that purport to love children. i get hate messages and death threats to my home simply for caring for my community. so it s very disturbing for me, personally, to hear people proclaim to be pro-life while they actively threaten my life and my child s life. congresswoman, you know, we have been hearing about regular public servants, whether at voting places or school boards, abortion doctors, being threatened and having violence presented against them. when you heard this kind of testimony, you know, what did it inspire amongst your fellow members of congress? did it make them want to call the supreme court, call the administration, call merrick garland to get more aggressive about this because you literally have people on the ground saying, i m being threatened