so, when will ginni thomas tell the committee all she knows about the insurrection? as the 11th hour gets underway on this thursday night good evening once again, i m stephanie ruhle. today the, january 6th committee made a powerful case about the relentless pressure donald trump and his allies put on mike pence to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election results. this afternoon, the committee presented detailed evidence revealing the intensity of that effort and the real danger pence was in on the day of the insurrection. mike pence, i hope you are going to stand up for the good of our constitution and for the good of our country. and if you are not, i m going to be very disappointed in you, i will tell you right now. i m telling you what, i m hearing the pence, i m hearing that pence just caved no i m hearing reports that pence caved. i m telling you, if pence caved, we are going to bleep through the streets. [inaudible] bring him out! bring out pence!
stephanie ruhle. today the, january 6th committee made a powerful case about the relentless pressure donald trump and his allies put on mike pence to unlawfully overturn the 2020 election results. this afternoon, the committee presented detailed evidence revealing the intensity of that effort and the real danger pence was in on the day of the insurrection. mike pence, i hope you are going to stand up for the good of our constitution and for the good of our country. and if you are not, i m going to be very disappointed in you, i will tell you right now. i m telling you what, i m hearing the pence, i m hearing that pence just caved no i m hearing reports that pence caved. i m telling you, if pence caved, we are going to bleep through the streets. [inaudible] bring him out! bring out pence! hang mike pence, hang mike pence! hang mike pence! [noise] hang mike pence, that s what they were chanting. today s star witnesses, two key republicans, pence s former w
The committee, to try to keep his emails out of the committee s hands. and that judge to review the evidence and not the criminal context where the burden of proof is beyond a criminal reasonable doubt. but in the lesser burden, the civil setting, would only needs to be more likely than not. that federal judge evaluated the evidence and said, it s more likely than not that john eastman and the president of the united states were committing crimes together. so, for doj to look at all of this evidence, it s clear that eastman has to be part of their investigation. the smart move, the savvy move here would be for eastman to decide to be that john dean in this story, to go in and to tell the truth, the full truth, and cooperate. so far, he s shown no tendency whatsoever to do that. and he has remained staunchly on the other side of that line. and that s why i think we heard judge luttig say in part that this is a clear and present danger, an ongoing problem, not
That federal judge evaluated the evidence and said, it s more likely than not that john eastman and the president of the united states were committing crimes together. so, for doj to look at all of this evidence, it s clear that eastman has to be part of their investigation. the smart move, the savvy move here would be for eastman to decide to be that john dean in this story, to go in and to tell the truth, the full truth, and cooperate. so far, he s shown no tendency whatsoever to do that. and he has remained staunchly on the other side of that line. and that s why i think we heard judge luttig say in part that this is a clear and present danger, an ongoing problem, not something that ended on january 6th. peter, eastman requested that pardon. he wrote it in the email to rudy giuliani. but the person in the white house who is focused, who is leading the charge on pardons was jared kushner. is that not the most jared kushner job ever?