[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] university of michigan professor barbara mcquaide joins us to discuss the Michael Flynn perjury case. That case before the full court of appeals in d. C. Circuit yesterday. Can you start by reminding viewers why it was before that full panel yesterday . Spit at this is very much a process case. A threejudge panel of the District Of Columbia courts has granted a motion. Its an extraordinary remedy that follows a judge would want to do something or not do something and directed the judge in Michael Flynn case to dismiss the case but would happen yesterday is all 10 judges were eligible to decide the case and vacated the Lower Court Opinion and started over. Host during that hearing Michael Flynns attorney argued that the u. S. District court judge overstepped his authority and not allowing the Justice Department to submit that case. Do you think the judge, judge sullivan overstepped hi
Against religious conduct released and stated in violation of the free exercise clause under Trinity Lutheran. The Montana Supreme Court disagrees and that court held boring schools did not violate the federal constitution. This board should reverse that judgment. Even respondents now concede that excluding Religious Schools from the program is unconstitutional they are viewed that the court avoided this discrimination by invalidating the entire program. This is wrong. The only reason the court invalidated the program was because it included Religious Schools and the courts remedy did not cure its discriminatory judgment nor should the remedy shielded judgment from review. Petitioners brought this lawsuit because they were denied scholarships based on religion and they are still being denied scholarships based on religion. If the court had shut down the program because it included muslim schools or africanamerican schools, theres no question that would be unconstitutional. We ask you t
Jan sings live at mechanics in new york. Former President Drum tries to find some way to fight that 464 million Fraud Judgment against him. What no bond means for a potential appeal and his business empire. A lot has changed since President Biden and israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last spoke. Thousands have died. Private disputes about the direction of the war have started spilling out into the public. Among the topics discussed today, israels possible invasion of rafah which President Biden has said would be a red line. Oral arguments in front of the Supreme Court turn tense as the justices hear arguments on the latest case testing the limits of free speech in the internet era. The potential impact on disinformation online coming up. We start with former President Donald Trump unable to obtain a bond to satisfy the 463 million bond. Traums lawyers say theyve got to 30 different companies, but none of them will put up the bond which would actually require collateral represen
A consequential when the former president just touting the Supreme Courts unanimous ruling saying that states cannot kick him off the 2024 primary ballot really capitol riot. How the justices explained their decision and how it might impact states heading into Super Tuesday Plus Vice President Kamala Harris, turning up the pressure sure. On israel calling for an immediate ceasefire in gaza. New talks happening today at the white house. As the us begins airdropping food into the enclave and it is one of aviations biggest mysteries. Now, nearly ten years after Malaysia Airlines flight 370 disappeared, theres a renewed push to find the missing plane why the malaysian government says it may reopen the case were following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to Cnn News Central thanks so much for joining us this this afternoon on Cnn News Central, Boris Sanchez alongside Brianna Keilar in washington, dc. The big headline this afternoon, donald trump is not d
single sentence that favors or even slightly sympathizes with donald trump s argument for presidential immunity. instead, the d.c. appeals court stands up trump s defenses only to knock them down one by one. the judges reached back through history citing case law from the early 1800s along with founders themselves on how they envisioned the power and limitations of the presidency. the court concludes quote, for the purposes of h criminal case, former president trump has become citizen trump with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. on trump s argument that the separation of powers doctrine bars judicial review of executive actions, the court cited presidents nixon and truman, both of whom were found to have exceeded their authority by the supreme court. nixon on trying to shield his tapes and truman on trying to seize steel mills. they also cited an 1882 supreme court ruling that said officers of the government can be sued pulling directly from the decision, q