Now on bbc news its time for click. This week, regenerating teeth, unusual vegetation, and, goodness gracious, Great Balls Of Fire energy, as our demand for it grows, the world is faced with a challenge. When we burn coal, the energy that has been stored inside formally for millions of years is released, to power cities and machines. But so, of course, is all the bad stuff that is polluting and changing the environment. Countries have met and agreed to reduce Carbon Emissions and invest in cleaner energy solutions, we are harnessing more solar and wind energy than ever, and last month the uk had its first day of Electricity Supply without burning any coal. But, green power is still a long way from taking over from fossil fuels. But what if there was a Clean Energy Source that could release 10 million times more energy than fossil fuels, with an almost limitless supply which could keep the planet running for millions of years . Well, turns out, there is, and the answer lies in the stars
Now on bbc news its time for click. This week, regenerating teeth, unusual vegetation, and, goodness gracious, Great Balls Of Fire energy, as our demand for it grows, the world is faced with a challenge. When we burn coal, the energy that has been stored inside formally for millions of years is released, to power cities and machines. But so, of course, is all the bad stuff that is polluting and changing the environment. Countries have met and agreed to reduce Carbon Emissions and invest in cleaner energy solutions, we are harnessing more solar and wind energy than ever, and last month the uk had its first day of Electricity Supply without burning any coal. But, green power is still a long way from taking over from fossil fuels. But what if there was a Clean Energy Source that could release 10 million times more energy than fossil fuels, with an almost limitless supply which could keep the planet running for millions of years . Well, turns out, there is, and the answer lies in the stars
Energy, as our demand for it grows, the world is faced with a challenge. When we burn coal, the energy that has been stored inside formally and is of years is released, to power cities and machines. But so, of course, is all the bad stuff that is polluting and changing the environment. Countries have met and agreed to reduce Carbon Emissions and invest in clean energy solutions, we are harnessing more solar and wind energy than ever, and last month the uk had its first day of Electricity Supply without burning any coal. But, green power is still a long way from taking over from fossil fuels. But what if there was a Clean Energy Source that could release 10 million times more energy than fossil fuels, with an almost limitless supply which could keep the planet running for millions of years. Well, turns out, there is, and the answer lies in the stars. In the heart of the sun, under intense pressure and heat, Hydrogen Atoms change from gas into superhot plasma, and in this burning soup, t
End of the year i no longer wanted to be involved as chairman. Not because i didnt believe in the group or because im running or not running, my position has not changed. Neil said Nikki Haley is an attractive candidate, do you think no labels would look to her . They have sore loser laws, im not sure if that is possible. I came out and endorsed Nikki Haley. She is our strongest choice and the best candidate for november, polls show she is beating biden handily. If she is close in new hampshire, well see what happens. Tonight is a big night. You guys are freezing, we are only 30 and snow in washington, I Cant imagine getting out to the caucuses, interesting to see
campaign? so write-in laws are very different. they vary across the country. some states would accept those write-in votes, some states would say our sore loser law applies, we re not going to count those. i haven t done a separate study on the write-in laws but, frankly, the number of candidates who get elected for national office is slim to none. why do we have sore loser laws? sore loser laws were designed 100 years or so and they protect the party nominees from somebody who lost in a political party primary and says, you know what, i want to run in a general. the idea is if you lost, you lost and you don t get a second bite at the apple to run in the general without having won a party primary. i would argue they re outdated to the extent they ever served a useful purpose. my short version would be where gallup says 42% says they are