Q.21 At the time of his arrest the accused was seen wearing the same blood stained shirt which he was wearing 2 or 3 days ago when the murder was committed. The defence argues that it was.
Q.11 Whether a statement by the accused that the weapon discovered was (“the weapon with which he committed murder”), will fall under Section 27 which contains the words “whether it amounts to a.
I N T R O D U C T I O N Any discussion on Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 will be incomplete without reference to Sections 25 and 26 of the Evidence Act. Section 25 prohibits proof of.
C O N T E N T SSl. No:I N N E R T I T L E SPARANO.ATHE IMPELLING PROVOCATION FOR THIS ARTICLE. 1BWRONG VERDICTS AT THE TOP MAY BREED MYRIADS OF ILLEGALITIES AT THE BOTTOM.2CPERNICIOUS TREND OF.
The answer to this question can be in the “negative” in the majority of cases and “positive” in certain limited category of cases. The celebrated Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emporer AIR 1947 PC 67 (Lord.