saying ahead, protest mad. i ll cover your legal fees, knock these guys out and his rallies he s never been held responsible for. no, he hasn t and so this culture of intimidation and threat threats and violence is something very purposefully stoked and conditioned to this environment. for moments like this. another person who s getting death threats is alvin bragg, the d a. and one of the things molly as you know that they keep doing is trying to link him to george soros. so george soros is the a universal bogeyman for a lot of people on the right. and they say that alvin bragg was supported by him . they the truth is the two have never met. they ve never communicated. they ve never spoken on the phone, however. george soros did give to a pack that is a sort of social justice pack that contributed some money . too many different campaigns. one of them was alvin brooks. yes as a jew, i ve i ve sat in horror and watch these trump supporters say like trump is good fo
heatwaves and a mild autumn and spring. hello, welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me, rachel cunliffe, senior associate editor at the new statesman, and claire cohen, journalist and author. we will say hello properly to both in just a minute. we will say hello properly to both injusta minute. first, though, let s take a look at those actual front pages. with fresh strikes expected in the new year and reports of new anti strike laws, the financial times leads with a warning from incoming boss of the tuc, paul nowak, who said unions will fight and make the government pay a high political price for such laws. the independent has gone with a striking image of the impact of recent russian bombardment in ukraine. they re also shining a light on striking chaos, with a warning that the uk could see a year of disruption if the government fails to negotiate. in contrast, the times leads with labour s vow to combat anti social behaviour as
shannon: she was a pioneer in so many ways. you reference her time out west and where she was from and it was such an interesting back drop to see her become the first female appointed to the supreme court. she often told the story about graduating from stanford and not being able to get a job. no law firm would hire her as a woman in the 50s and 60s. she struggled to make it in the legal profession. to think she came out of school, she found a roadblock to any kind of legal career and she decided to plow forward and ends up on the supreme court. it is a really fascinating, truly american story. she went out and campaigned to become a judge because she saw this is my avenue. she didn t win the first election. she did ultimately end up becoming a judge but another part of her interesting background is she was a lawmaker in arizona in the state senate. so she had a real appreciation for all of the different branches, for fighting her way into the legal profession. she had a h
called anti lgbtq laws so you couldn t have the sports teams. you couldn t have state officials going to other states that had controversial laws and just a couple of days ago, the one of the leading legislators who supported us said it s not working, and we have to repeal this because there s too much business going on across the country. we have to travel and it would lead to a civil war. i mean, if you can t even also making it very personal. remember the civil war? what it was called. the war between the states are making it very personal. between states like your state is. you mean hampshire? sure where you re going kind of purple now, right? i mean, it s a little more red than purple, but yeah, we always get stuff done, right? i mean, well, here s the thing he s talking about freedom, less states that are less free, isn t he? the guy who told everybody they had to stay home during covid, and then he went to some lobbyist dinner with what 25 of his best friends, so they were hangi
focused primarily on try to keep cases basically to zero and continuing to impose very strict lockdown measures while the rest of the world was working out, as we were here in the uk, what measures you needed to limit the spread but to enable people to kind of start to go about their daily lives. as that process continued, we saw how successful vaccinations were, and that in turn spurred more people to go and get vaccinated, and now we are where we are, whereas china has beenin are where we are, whereas china has been in this heightened lockdown state. they very recently reversed that and they have started to ease up that and they have started to ease up as a result cases have absolutely skyrocketed to levels that are i wandering, and there is a real concern in the rest of the road that david will be a new variance, and we have been for that before, and that it might be safer to reimpose travel research and the make sure the people coming from china to other countries have a negative c