Latest Breaking News On - Lin larson - Page 1 : comparemela.com

well, your honor, we think we prevail under either test but we think this case is closer to larson because in larson, what you had was a facially neutral law. it didn t not mention religious domination by name but it did focus on religious groups and the result of it was to distinguish between them in a way that favored some and not others. and that s exactly what we have here. we have an order that on its face doesn t mention any denomination, but that is we have alleged and there s strong evidence already to support is intended to favor some religious groups over others and that is that is exactly the situation in larson. now i know the other side is saying if it doesn t mention a particular denomination on the face of the document, that isn t what larson said. in larson, the law did not mention a denomination. again, we also think we prevail under the lemon test which is explained in some detail in our district court briefing. we do not unfortunately have space to describe tha

Weyour-honor
Dinn-case
Test
Groups
Larson
It-didn-t
Result
Facially-neutral-law
Domination
Name
Order
Evidence