Lawrence Jones travels from coast to coast covering the biggest issues facing all Americans and a wide range of stories from politics, sports, entertainment.
separate incidents in 1979 and 2005. on top of that, they showed the access hollywood tape from 2005 in which the former president says that he inappropriately touched a women in an inappropriate place. with that tape and those two witnesses being allowed to testify in this case, i think really helped them zero in on the two things of sexual assault and the forcibly touched. the issue of rape, they didn t hear enough to be able to talk to find him liable on that point. ly say, neil, there s this issue about the dress that she wore on that day. there was a debate before this trial started as to whether or not that dress that carroll says she kept would be allowed to be used as evidence in this case. ultimately it was not. a part of that is because the judge believed that dna wouldn t be able to necessarily prove without a reasonable doubt prove that this had happened or did not happen in the dressing room. neil? neil: in this case, if true,
justice since it was founded by grant in 1870. and we have most dangerous attorney general since george washington hand-picked an attorney general in 1795. attorney general did not become a person who would be confirmed by senate and head of department of justice until the department of justice was founded in 1870. you know the department of justice the a ag, fbi, u.s. attorney, none of them are in the constitution. they were created by congress. how can it be they can stiff arm the united states congress? here is the deal. they can t. ly say jim jordan or james comer hold hearings, but they need information, they need witnesses. they ask them to voltaire lvoluntarily provide them, and executive branch says
justice since it was founded by grant in 1870. and we have most dangerous attorney general since george washington hand-picked an attorney general in 1795. attorney general did not become a person who would be confirmed by senate and head of department of justice until the department of justice was founded in 1870. you know the department of justice the ag, fbi, u.s. attorney, none of them are in the constitution. they were created by congress. how can it be they can stiff arm the united states congress? here is the deal. they can t. ly say jim jordan or james comer hold hearings, but they need information, they need witnesses. they ask them to voltaire voluntarily provide them, and executive branch says
what the attorney general has to say, but we did hear from alberta gonzalez, during the bush administration this morning, and he said that he thinks, yes, a special counsel should be appointed. do you think a special counsel will be appointed just knowing the universe of information that is out there, the political pressure that is now being applied. what do you think? it is really hard to say, kate. ly say that the special council regulations say that only where a criminal investigation into an individual or a situation is warranted should a special counsel be appointed. so, if you take that literally and the u.s. attorney in chicago decides that no full blown investigation is warranted, then special counsel should not be appointed. that said, merrick garland is very cautious on these matters so i wouldn t be surprised to see him appoint a special counsel.