Stay updated with breaking news from Like nadler. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
today on inside politics, we re not going anywhere. you re struck with us. those promises to ukraine came directly from the president of the united states today. that as the west outlines that country s path toward nato membership. but exactly when ukraine can walk down that road remains a life or death decision. i m dana bash in washington. and i m wolf blitzer reporting live from lithuania, where this hour we expect to hear directly from the president of the united states joe biden. his speech will follow a rather contentious few days. ukraine has publicly questioned why its allies are waiting to formally admit the countries into nato. ukraine s president volodymyr zelenskyy struck very different tones. he says he s grateful for the great unity and for long lasting american security garn tees, but he also used stark terms to describe the costs of nato s decision to keep ukraine at arm s length. we are over at the university where the president is getting ready to ....
this hear ing is a little moe than performance art. it s an will be rat show de designed with only two purposes in mind. to protect donald trump from the consequences of his actions and to return them to the white house in the next election. so that was clearly jerry nadler, the top democrat on the judiciary committee. like nadler, many other democrats also focused their questioning on donald trump. we heard from adam schiff and zo lofgren, two members on the january 6th committee, question wray on whether he was potentially not going far enough in their handling of the investigation following january 6th and their handling of donald trump specifically. so clearly, we re seeing the two different sides and how they are questioning wray today. republicans focused on the key things they have been investigating with a series of different issues and democrats really focusing on donald trump. ....
Is the defendant and due process would guarantee him more fairness, certainly would guarantee him certain rights. if the purpose, at the house manager stated, for witnesses, is to compare the disparities in facts, that i would have called a different list of witnesses. what we ought to be doing instead of this is doing what the american people want us to do, which is make that schools better and preserve social security and rain in the hmos. there were some on my side i was not among them but some argued strongly that they ought to pull witnesses and he resisted it every step of the way. there has not been a good explanation why 60,000 pages of testimony was good enough for the house but it isn t good for the senate. sean: when they are not pushing there impeachment or trial, democrats like nadler, the 90 nadler, are spreading more election conspiracy theories. now claiming my favorite line of all president trump is in ....
In leading trump investigations, but pelosi s spokeswoman writing that she and committee chairs agree to, quote keep all options on the table and move forward with an aggressive hearing and legislative strategy, something nadler told house members in a conference call according to multiple participants, offering alternative solutions to keeping the pressure on trump after unsuccessful negotiations with pelosi. nadler planning to ramp up on growing obstruction of justice investigations into the administration, by issuing more subpoenas and holding more officials in contempt of congress, if necessary. and this question about whether or not it is time to open up an impeach inquiry, of course, has divided democrats for several months now, but we re starting to see a bit more pressure from leading committee chairman like nadler. and of course, the question is how many more democrats will come out in support of an impeachment inquiry in upcoming days or weeks. john? the number has been r ....
That mueller was not going to charge obstruction even if he could. mueller didn t say that yesterday. he didn t say he would have charged them but also said he wouldn t have. that is the gap the guys like nadler are seeing. i have looked closely at those comments between william barr and his reference to their conversation. i don t think there is any daylight. they are saying the same thing with slightly different words. mister mueller was clear he thought the attorney general acted in good faith in this process and if he felt differently yesterday would be an opportunity to say so. i thought his comments that he hoped this was the last he would speak of it and the only thing he would be willing to say is what is in the report sets up an interesting dynamic for those excited about the prospect of him testifying before congress. a lot of people when we did hear from him wanted more definitive answers and unfortunately for a lot of people we didn t get that. what happens next? the ....