we ll kickback this money to you vis-a-vis the taxpayer money? yeah it is textbook pay for play, obviously. in the case of solyndra and the case of lightsquared what we have are complete denies denials from the white house and their spin there s politics had anything to do witht. when in both cases you had long-standing relationships between the democrat party, team obama and these donors who were able to siphon hundreds of millions, if not billions away from the taxpayers r their failed ventures. i think the lightsquared one is particularly worrisome to me. is similar to fast and furious in that these are both reckless judgments that did and may have risked american lives and american security. sean: there s two other components that s a very important one. remember, in the case of lightsquared, you are dealing
believes would be the winners and losers and ignoring all of the red flags about this green jobs bomb! then being able to get off the hook! that s the thing. we pay, we are paying for this. sean: 535 billions that s a lot of money. a lot of poor people. the 42.6 million in poverty could be helped. fast and furious, solyndra and lightsquared. lightsquared and solyndra interesting in this regard. they both have two things in common. they ve got big bundler donors to the obama campaign in 2008. they have access to high ranking people in washington. that results in money that was not wise to spend and money poured down the drain. the question is, are you buying access? is this pay to play? give us money, help elect us,
we ll kickback this money to you vis-a-vis the taxpayer money? yeah it is textbook pay for play, obviously. in the case of solyndra and the case of lightsquared what we have are complete denies denials from the white house and their spin there s politics had anything to do with it. when in both cases you had long-standing relationships between the democrat party, team obama and these donors who were able to siphon hundreds of millions, if not billions away from the taxpayers for their failed ventures. i think the lightsquared one is particularly worrisome to me. is similar to fast and furious in that these are both reckless judgments that did and may have risked american lives and american security. sean: there s two other components that s a very important one. remember, in the case of lightsquared, you are dealing
believes would be the winners and losers and ignoring all of the red flags about this green jobs bomb! then being able to get off the hook! that s the thing. we pay, we are paying for this. sean: 535 billions that s a lot of money. a lot of poor people. the 42.6 million in poverty could be helped. fast and furious, solyndra and lightsquared. lightsquared and solyndra interesting in this regard. they both have two things in common. they ve got big bundler donors to the obama campaign in 2008. they have access to high ranking people in washington. that results in money that was not wise to spend and money poured down the drain. the question is, are you buying access? is this pay to play? give us money, help elect us,
that he was pocketing money, campaign finance cash from at least a quartet of big donors who were involved in all of the machinations around lightsquared and its predecessor. sean: last question. we know this is going to be political because people are aggravated at how dysfunctional government is record debt, failed stimulus, lack of jobs. do you see anything criminal here? we only have seconds. after the investigators are look into this now. what i see is just the stench of culture of corruption building and building around this white house that has gotten away for so long with stonewalling people. that stonewall is crumbling, thanks to so many whistle-blowers inside and outside government. victims of so many of these schemes, rackets. i can t imagine this is going to stand in 2012. don t let it! sean: michelle malkin appreciate your being with us.