Stay updated with breaking news from Lets unpack it. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
May come back to haunt her and her credibility and also it is documented, she said it for herself in the mueller report that she was not truthful with the press. i think she has some issues she has some issues there, but you never know in this new normal or new whatever is you want to call it. nothing new about it. lying is as old as language itself. but not to this degree, man. i got to tell you. everybody says, oh, politicians always lie, yes, but this is on steroids. this is a whole new chapter in our history when it comes to at least the folks at the white house. we ve never seen anything like this on any level. true enough. one more reason why hoopen hearings with people from the mueller report is so important because nobody s going to read it. what do you got coming up? i m going to ask this ....
We have given people notice. so they understand that you have to continue to make progress and what i think is exciting about this process is there s so many engaged people because these candidates all have a base of support and we have to play, what i call a long game here. if we re perceived as saying you shouldn t be in, then we re going to be committing a lot of those that got us in trouble four years ago. so i firmly believe that we need to make sure that we give everybody an opportunity. i believe the definition of success is to make sure that all the candidates that don t make it to the mountain top believe and their supporters believe because it s true that they got a fair shake. would you ever think that way our nominee would sprint across the starting line. would you ever think about doing something different? let s say you still have let s say 10 that are doing some what well as you get close to convention time. would you ever think about ....
Fix the system. this will happen again. why has congress done almost nothing about it? is the senate s majority leader intentionally trying to let russia interfere again? if not, why does he do nothing? we re going to pull back the curtain on mitch mcconnell. and the curtain is about to drop on sarah sanders. the government watchdog calls for the firing of the president s most effective mouth piece, kellyanne dconway. tough day for the president. who will be left around him? let s get after it. the head of the federal election commission just delivered a scathing rebuke to president trump. this is new. here s the quote. let me make something 100% clear, it is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a u.s. election. ....
What the president said is wrong. what his son tried to do was wrong. that s probably why they lied about it and put out a false explanation. there is no need to try to mitigate the impact by casting blame on others. the energy should be on calling out what is wrong and then fixing the system. the right going quiet about this president is expected. but how can the senate not want to require people to report foreign solicitations? how can congress not be working together to harden the elections against known and expected future interference? they all agree, except this president, that russia did it, is doing it now, and wants to do more of it in the next election? and this environment, and with this attorney general, let s be honest, we don t even know for sure that if the russians did try to help his campaign again, do we even know that this ....
I m like why you? right off the bat we re stumped. he said two things i wanted your take on. one is there s too many people and what president obama once said about the republicans is their firing squad is going to turn into a circular one and that s no good for the democrats. the other one is they have to be careful about political correctness because they wind up punishing their friends. they wind up punishing people with them. the right doesn t give a damn and it works to your disadvantage. too many and too much pc. do you agree with either? i don t think it s the role of the dnc chair to say there s too many or there s too few. i think we have spectacular candidates. there s 23 won t make it to the mountain top. my job is to make sure that everybody gets a fair opportunity to communicate their vision. we re moving through the debate cycle and in september we ll be raising the threshold. ....