Is next. Host this is the washington journal for december 13 and it is the House Judiciary Committee mary meeting at 10 00 to vote on articles of impeachment after a 14 hour debate yesterday of the articles themselves and proposed amendments by republicans, all of which were rejected. Our coverage will start at 9 30 this morning and up until then, we take your comments on this latest phase of the impeachment process. Here is how you can call us and let you know let us know your thoughts. 2027488001 for republicans. 2027488000 for democrats. And independents, 2027488002. Atyou want to text us, do so 2027488003. You can post on our fitter twitter feed at cspanwj. If you want to post on our facebook, you can do that at facebook. Com cspan. The website is available at cspan. Org if you want to watch the proceedings from yesterday, 14 hours in length. A vote was expected yesterday. However, it was at the end of the session this happened. [video clip] there has been a long two days of consid
So what are the things i thought was interesting was to learn the rationale to address this in a fashion other than with your name attached to it. But that is an issue that why not attach your name to it . You are down at the white house every day what have you learned quex. To dispel some things that we already knew and one was his reaction there wasnt any major disclosures that surprised me because for much of the reporting of President Trumps style or to go into briefings for their talking points are put down to one bullet point that is known at this point. That doesnt make the book less important but thats not necessarily landing within a major impact because there is conventional wisdom. If you say no thats not true quex. I am not in a position but we get a lot of white house correspondence and certainly we are not in the room for everything. So im not in a position to judge. The book is written with the air or tone of a thorough one authority may be somebody who knows what the wh
A live look at the upcoming term continues with remarks from former u. S. Supreme court law clerks. The George Washington law overview and the National Constitution center started about 10 minutes ago. One thing that just struck me was that there was a component to the interview, but the result was a very personal component and what she talked about is that she really cares deeply that the clerks are civil with each other, and are good people and well get along with each other and with clerks for all the other chambers. She will try to screen for that. That was that, and i got a call a week later and i was obviously thrilled to say yes, and it was an amazing year. So, i will turn to rory little. Au really did in a red and real sense clerk for five justices which has to be the modern record. Tell about how you got hired by Justice Stewart, and then how you came to be the serial law clerk. Many bostons we have in the crowd. If you are still looking for a job. Got there through the backdo
Conference continuing through most of the day today. If you missed any of what Vice President pence had to say, you will be able to watch it on cspan. Org. The search bar on our home page. We will also reair his remarks tonight at 8 00 eastern on cspan. Coming up next, live coverage of the John Batchelor Radio Program from the stage. Later, we will have conversations with senator ted cruz, education secretary betsy devos, and labor secretary alex acosta. Trumps sonsident eric trump to read tomorrow, we will have President Trump speaking to the gathering after washington journal. Comments fromave Kellyanne Conway and fcc chair ai. High a ajit p [general chatter] [general chatter] you heard Vice President pence mention the reverend billy graham who passed away yesterday at the age of 99. Officepeaker paul ryans announced plans for a memorial at the capitol. Speaker ryan said in a statement, the late reverend billy graham will be brought to the capitol, where he will lie in on in the rotu
Legislative power that is addressed in article section 1 from the election of senators in article 1 section 3. And again in smiley that made clear that the meaning, as this court reiterated just last week in yates, that the meaning of a term in an enactment may differ depending on the function that the term is serving. Now youre going to the statute. But just under the constitution youre saying the legislature in the first article of section 3, the now repealed section that talks about choosing senators means Something Different than it means in the following section. As this court explained in smith versus hawk, which was an article 5 question of the meaning of the word legislature for purposes of ratification. In smith versus hawk, this court said that in the article 1 section 3 election of senators by the legislature and in article 5 the ratification power, what was at issue was a power that is the power to elect and the power to ratify that specifically comported with the elected r