here today. thank you, senator whitehouse bellamy say a positive word to follow up this committee and the last few week, this passed legislation assignment signed into law by president biden which in cases of sexual harassment provide that individuals who are complaining of the option of a jury trial, despite efforts to steer them into mandatory arbitration as the decision of the complainant. i think that is a step in the right direction and will be passed out of this committee on a bipartisan basis. i like to ask everyone to consider returning promptly at 1:30 for the much anticipated senator lee. we are live on capitol hill with our senators on the judiciary committee made their probe for lunch on whether
0 christianity, judaism, islam, embraces traditional definition of marriage, correct? i am aware that there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity of state marriage laws, that it will inevitably sit in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts as people raise issues. i am limited with what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide to, i m just asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right, and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area w