how are you? it s like a weird. numbness. i know that s a selfish point of view. but you come to a point where you just think, how much are you supposed to take? if all of those people that write all of that stuff. do they ever think that there s actually. ..a person at the other end? and so. ..hereiam, um. are you feeling 0k to do this? are you feeling strong enough to do this interview? yeah, i have to. why? why do you want to do this interview? because there is an innocent person here who didn t do anything wrong. who is.vulnerable. ..and probably feels like i do. let me say, you know, a lot of my questions are going to be uncomfortable and, let s face it, intrusive. but you ve chosen this opportunity to tell your side of the story. and there are questions that your viewers, all the people who supported you over the years including your family will want answers to. there s also, of course, lots of questions for itv in all this. you mentioned this young man, and at th
a signalling fault looks to be the most likely cause of india s deadliest train crash in more than a generation. at least 275 people were killed. hundreds of families are still scouring hospitals and morgues for missing relatives and authorities are struggling to identify the bodies. it happened when three trains collided near balasore, in the eastern state of odisha, as our india correspondent, archana shukla reports from the scene. hours have passed but not the pain. more injured brought in, but the struggle to find those missing continues. this is the last picture lilavati has of her 21 year old son, taken when he boarded the ill fated train. the 30 hour journey to reach the accident site has yielded nothing. translation: we have looked in all hospitals and morgues . here but can t find him. at the morgue we even asked to see the photos of dead bodies over and over. he s not there. eight other members of lilavati s family on the same train were found. but with still no sig
He s a hugely talented and capable young man. massively talented. yeah. just before we get into the relationship and what happened after that moment in the dressing room, if we go back, because you were very specific in your wording in your statement about how the relationship was unwise but not illegal . and the question is of legality centres around your relationship with him before he was 18. just be really clear your relationship between when you met him when he was 15 and then when he was 18 was occasional direct messages. no pictures of each other sent to each other? no. occasional direct messages, and you would say that that wasn t really flirtatious at all. just work related, just, you know, career, careeradvice, career help. and no sort of sexual forwardness at all in any of that stuff? 0k. how long did you then have a relationship with him which was sexual in nature? as i said, it probably happened. ..five times, maybe six times, but nothing more than that. so when did
Job. he was very good at experience with the show. he got the job. he was very good at his - job. he was very good at his job. everybody loves them and worked very hard. it’s everybody loves them and worked very hard. . . . everybody loves them and worked very hard. , . ., ., everybody loves them and worked very hard. fl. ., ., , .,, hard. it s clear from the testimony that at the hard. it s clear from the testimony that at the people hard. it s clear from the testimony that at the people think hard. it s clear from the testimony that at the people think he s - that at the people think he s usually talented. massively talented. before we get to the relationship, if we go back, you are specific in your wording and the relationship about how it was unwise and not illegal. the question of legality centres are on your quests a relationship with him before you re 18. a relationship with him before you re18. before you met him when he was 18, your relationship was occasional dir