with a 10-foot cattle prod. buzzfeed went ahead anyway and it back to the question, what would a dossier against the democratic nominee ever be published without any vetting processes? rhetorical beer don t bother answering that. smith was actually getting a promotion, going from buzzfeed to the new york times and being hired to cover media. you look at maggie haberman as well, she is no different from jim acosta who led the media as far as covering donald trump with hostility, using unnamed sources, but will not do the same with the biden administration. he removed himself from the position of white house correspondent to do some weekend show that almost no one watches. and haberman is a paid employee of sand on beer she worked with jen psaki along with multiple members of the obama-biden administration. there is a clear conflict of interest here and it s very apparent to everybody because the new york times stock is down 16% this year. that is a reason for that. sean: that is
buzzfeed went ahead anyway and it back to the question, what would a dossier against the democratic nominee ever be published without any vetting processes? rhetorical. don t bother answering that. smith was actually getting a promotion, going from buzzfeed to the new york times and being hired to cover media. you look at maggie haberman as well, she is no different from jim acosta who led the media as far as covering donald trump with hostility, using unnamed sources, but will not do the same with the biden administration. he removed himself from the position of white housee correspondent to do some weekend show that almost no one watches. and haberman is a paid employee of cnn.. she worked with jen psaki alongl with multiple members of the obama-biden administration. there is a clear conflict of interest here and it s very apparent to everybody because the new york times stock is down 16% this year. that is a reason for that. sean: that is why you need your own media show.
the los angeles times, buzzfeed, the huffington post, the daily beast. they are terrible. rolling stone, slate, abc, for newsweek. they ate it all up. cnn says smollett s actions have backed the movement. no, i didn t. maybe it set back the oaks crime movement and that s good perhaps the media might think first so it will have fewer hoaxes but d. the media says no one should be pleased by the events that fake hoaxes hurt real victims but they never mention the groups who are falsely accused. seriously, this could have led to real violence against them. instead, the press even if the crime isn t true here, it s got to be true somewhere else. and how awful are the conservatives. pouncing on this now? sorry. if you are sad this turned out to be a hoax, it s only because your network, your paper, and your assumptions were wrong. me? i m pleased.
but what fueled this particular media fire was the president s own tweet, passive, naive about people he appointed. it s reminiscent to some degree. fighting the fbi, saying it s doing a lousy job. apparently differing views. he named them. he s not taking responsibility. let s put the blame on the media. that s the most of concerning part. the fake news,ed the media is always wrong. we need journalists across the board to do the digging and hold people accountable. i was covering mid-term elections in florida. i went to a ron desantis rally. rudy giuliani took the stage,
always right. but what fueled this particular media fire was the president s own tweet, passive, naive about people he appointed. it s reminiscent to some degree. fighting the fbi, saying it s doing a lousy job. apparently differing views. he named them. he s not taking responsibility. let s put the blame on the media. that s the most of concerning part. the fake news,ed the media is always wrong. we need journalists across the board to do the digging and hold people accountable. i was covering mid-term elections in florida. i went to a ron desantis rally.