Ukraine had a statement about Fighting Corruption and mr. Yermak would say burr mace in 2016. Mr. Yermak provided me a draft statement, and i wanted to be assured that this statement would actually correct the perception that mr. Giuliani had of ukraine and what they stand for now so that that would also be conveyed to President Trump and solve this problem that id observed with our may 23rd meeting with the president. The problem that hes getting a bad set of information, Statement Like this could potentially correct that. So was mr. Giuliani satisfied with this statement . No, he was not. Why not . He believed that it needed to say burisma and 2016 specifically or else it would not be credible, it would not mean anything new. So, in fact, mr. Jewel yagiu wanted it to State Burisma and
one specifically for President Trump. Mr. Ambassador, heres the text you sent to the ukrainian official on august 13th, lets put that up on the screen. You said hi, andre. Good talking. Following is the
Giuliani. Mr. Giuliani said they thought ukraine should make a statement about Fighting Corruption and mr. Yermac provided me a draft statement and i wanted to be assured that this statement would actually correct the perception that mr. Giuliani had of ukraine and what they stand for now so that that would also be conveyed to President Trump and solve this problem that i had observed with our may 23rd meeting with the president. The problem being that hes getting bad set of information. A Statement Like this could potentially correct that. So was mr. Giuliani satisfied with this statement . No, he was not. Why not . He believed it needed to say burisma and 2016 specifically or else it would not be credible, it would not mean anything. So in fact mr. Giuliani wanted a statement that Referenced Burisma and 2016 elections explicitly. One that would benefit
essentially President Trump. Mr. Ambassador, heres the text you sent to the ukrainian official august 13th. You said hey andrey good
almost obligation to show the american people what happened on january 6th isn t just something of the past, that connecting that dot, that that danger is still alive today, and in fact, january 6th was just a dress rehearsal for what s to come. will they move to show that? well, i think they will, steph, because what we ve gotten thus far were, you know, letters from the select committee that were sent out to witnesses, cataloguing some of the evidence they expected that witness to provide, and then we would hear some things sort of leaking out, appropriately so, after some of the witnesses had testified, but we haven t seen the evidence with our own eyes. and you know, i for one think it is going to be a very compelling performance. the january 6th committee investigative team headed up by tim, a former expert rico prosecutor, from my former office, the dc u.s. attorney s office, that team of former federal prosecutors i believe has approached the january 6th investigation as if th
the committee s, i want to say, it s obligation to show the american people that what happened on january 6th isn t just something of the past, that connecting those dots, that that danger is still alive today and in fact january 6th was just a dress rehearsal for what is to come. will they be able to show that? oh, i think they will, steph. because what we have got in thus far were letters from the select committee that were sent out to witnesses, cataloging some of the evidence they expected that win is to provide, and then we would hear something s leaking out, appropriately so, after some of the witnesses had testified. but we haven t seen the evidence with our own eyes. and i for one think it is going to be a very compelling performance. the january 6th committee investigative team, headed up by tim keefe, a former expert prosecutor from my former office, the d. c. u.s. attorney s office. that team of former federal prosecutors i think has approached the jason vesta
on what should be done in order to fortify ourselves against coups and insurrections in the future. and that s it right there, glenn. the committee is, i want to say, it s obligation to show the american people that what happened on january 6th isn t just something of the past, that connecting those dots, that that danger is still alive today and in fact january 6th was just a dress rehearsal for what is to come. will they be able to show that? oh, i think they will, steph. because what we have got in thus far were letters from the select committee that were sent out to witnesses, cataloging some of the evidence they expected that win is to provide, and then we would hear something s leaking out, appropriately so, after some of the witnesses had testified. but we haven t seen the evidence with our own eyes. and i for one think it is going to be a very compelling performance. the january 6th committee