the good of the court and the country. they re putting pressure on the justices in realtime based on, apparently, inside information. the column flew under the radar. but following the lead to political, sure seems more than likely, a timely warning to conservatives on the court. and there s a context to look back now, which circumstantially, at least, fits with the pattern, perhaps, a conservative leaker trying to look and votes in place. she explains the leak explanation is a scam, and she joins me now. dahlia, ivan idea who leaked this? could ve been anybody. i m not inside knowledge. but that editorial the wall street editorial board sure looks real we are now, given the context of what we have now. yeah, and i would add to the mix that 2012 wall street journal editorial that told jen
knowledge of what the jockeying is around this decision? which, again, listen to ted cruise, is sacrilege. so, the wall street journal guesses, he did get the assignment, and those not public knowledge. they continue, quote, roberts may be trying to turn another justice now. we hope he doesn t succeed, for the good of the court and the country. they re putting pressure on the justices in realtime based on, apparently, inside information. the column flew under the radar. but following the leaked politico, sure seems more than likely, a timely warning to conservatives on the court. and there s a context to look back now, which circumstantially, at least, fits with the pattern, perhaps, a conservative leaker trying to lock and votes in place. she explains the leak explanation is a scam, and she joins me now.