knowledge of what the jockeying is around this decision? which, again, listen to ted cruise, is sacrilege. so, the wall street journal guesses, he did get the assignment, and those not public knowledge. they continue, quote, roberts may be trying to turn another justice now. we hope he doesn t succeed, for the good of the court and the country. they re putting pressure on the justices in realtime based on, apparently, inside information. the column flew under the radar. but following the leaked politico, sure seems more than likely, a timely warning to conservatives on the court. and there s a context to look back now, which circumstantially, at least, fits with the pattern, perhaps, a conservative leaker trying to lock and votes in place. she explains the leak explanation is a scam, and she joins me now.
advocating for the supreme court to overturn roe. but looking back, it sure seems to have a real insider look at the courts decision making. in fact, they write that she this is done or seem to be pushing for middle ground that would not totally be eviscerated roe. saying, quote, if you pose another justices side, he can write the parietal erupting that controls in the 63 decision. if he can t, then justice thomas would ve signed opinion and the vote can be five for. our guess is that justice alito would then get the assignment. well that s a real lucky guess. where is all that coming from? where is all this inside knowledge of what the jockeying is around this decision? which, again, listen to tread cruise, is sacrilege. so, the wall street journal guesses, he did get the assignment, and those not public knowledge. they continue, quote, roberts may be trying to turn another justice now. we ll be doesn t succeed, for