a decade, i consider her friend and i and i like her a lot. i disagree with her fundamentally on this and i think she s completely wrong. i think in fact, the exchangems that the gop has made here in terms of moving more on the cultural side towards this rising number of hispanic immigrant diverse group of voters who are not just brought into the coalition of 2020 but i think in there republican coalition going forward on these culture issues, the very issues she cites are a hugee number, a much bigger number than the number of suburban wealthy women who were going to be pro-abortion, you know,s shout your abortion kind of voters who are also going to be convinced to vote for mitt romney. i just don t t think that was a long term proposition that would work in any way.nk i think that the autopsy that was done in 2012 was about a party that was dead and thishi new coalition, this ones that i think is far more passionate that has a lot more going forbo it. and about the
our children and the world serialization of an extremere ideology so extreme that women and girls are forcedme to bear their child now hearing all this , of course, european leaders wouldn t think twice about jumping the scrum to slam the court do it as well. and by doing it, why can t and even think it was perfectly fine to make our taxpayers foot the lion s share of the bill for this point, this war at this point in ukraine? because when they all agree today that they are unanimous that the alliance will support ukraine for the long all i ll tell you what that means. tha that means that americans should be preparedtea to fund a disproportionate share of the war effort forre years by te national security adviser apparently thinks money grows on trees and he s seen reports i ve seen the reports of specific o details around advanced air defense capabilities that the united states is preparing to
though when you think that president trump when he was a businessman never got invited to this thing. they didn t want him as part of the group. but now that he is president, they have got to pay tension to him. steve: real quick, john, we heard there is a possibility when he gives the speech there could be a walkout because some people are steamed about some comments he may or may not have made. you know, that s always the case with this president, that, you know, is he a polarizing figure and he invites some people to express their dissatisfaction with him. you know, you can certainly have some people walk out of his address tomorrow. i would expect that the world leaders, the business leaders wouldn t, but, you know, there is a loft people on the periphery as well who wants to be part of the social agenda of davos, it s quite possible that some of them could walk out tomorrow. ainsley: i don t think the president cares. he is not there to serve angela merkel. is he there to serve
not give in to trump. steve: according to the jerusalem post. brian: and to personally attack donald trump. that would surprise me. kerry knows as a former secretary of state, former u.s. senator that that kind of advice would be stunning unpatriotic. and i don t think that john kerry would do something like that. i hope he wouldn t. i am perfectly happy for him to run for president. look, the more democrats who decide that they will run for president, the better off we are going to be in 2020. i think trump will beat any of them. it doesn t concern me very much. i think the economic boom we are starting into is going to, in fact, perform very well this fall for republicans. and i think that it s going to perform very well for trump in 2020. pause the contrast between the democrats inability to create jobs for 8 years and what trump is doing is going to be so great that i think the country will vote for more jobs and higher take home pay and a better