United states indicted on State Charges stemming from his and others efforts to overturn joe bidens election win in the State Of Georgia. I make decisions based on the facts and the law. We look at the facts and look at the law and bring charges. Having another indictment for him questioning the integrity of this countrys elections is what we are doing to a president that served this country. The governor of georgia i guess cant pardon. I dont know how you get out of this. Do i intend to try the 19 defendant in indictment together . Yes. The calendar is getting crowded. All the possible trials that the former president is facing. This case has a couple of twists on advice of counsel. You see some of the lawyers on whod advice they relied indicted. An abuse of power by angry democrats who decide the rule of law doesnt matter to them anymore. Its bigger than watergate. It goes to the foundation of democracy. This is very different and much more serious and much more troubling. Good morni
and it s not as if she is breaking the law, but she could really have the judge come down on her hard. and she could raise arguments that trump will eventually raise as to tainting the jury pool, that. but the headline here, you know, let s just take a step back. the fulton county da, they clearly recommended the indictment of donald trump, not to mention maybe how do you know that? she has as much as said it. i won t tell you, but the initials are donald trump. when they asked, well, he says he was completely exonerated. she literally rolls her eyes and laughs. there are four different ways in which she really makes it beyond any doubt there is a possibility willis doesn t take her up on the recommendation. but it s a small one. so, yes, absolutely right, she s talking out of school. it s not good for the case. but man, we re going to have for the first time in the history the country a fulton county da s going to indict not just trump, but almost certainly it seems to
coup-plotting and pathologically duplicitous ex-president to subvert american democrat see and the process of given the persistent power of donald j. trump in the republican party and the depoched and decrepit party, will end the way it did with wyoming congresswoman liz cheney losing in a landslide. cheney s unforgivable sin in the ice of maga voters and a bunch of other republican voters, too, along with team trump cultivated and blessed the candidate who defeated her when it came to her conviction that trump is nothing more than an existential threat to our republic and cheney acknowledged as much. years ago i won this primary with 37% of the vote. i could easily have done the same again. the path was clear.7% of the vo. i could easily have done the same again. the path was clear.3% of the vo. i could easily have done the same again. the path was clear. but it would have required they go along with the lie of the 2720 election, that i would unravel our democratic system
infamous insurrection. she drew on the front row seat to provide new damning details of the attempted coup. today, this was the sixth insurrection hearing. we tried to cover them precisely. the first hearing detailed violent crimes by many, though sometimes without clear causal links to trump. another hearing shows the liability of trump appointees and lawyers raising questions about donald trump s own role. other hearings featured republicans from pence s office at the state level and on this program we report how some parts of some of those hearings did fall short. those hearings all had in their own way very important material, but not every hearing has been a blockbuster when it comes to evidence. today s hearing delivered the evidence. firsthand smoking gun evidence on trump s mind and overt acts for violence in the attempted coup. let me repeat that reporting up front. proving crime requires proving the state of mind and overt action. today s hearing features and featur
that new york or georgia, there is nothing he can do about it per se. the federal jurisdiction, then that question becomes a big one and suggest we are talking about through the campaign season again. this is like law school hypothetical. what if he wins the election, gets rid of the federal cases, can he be tried in state court? probably no, not while president. it s all in play. love the hypotheticals. i want to ask you. you made an interesting point, intentional or unintentional. you said this is the opposite of what a president should have been doing, which was quite literally the point ruby freeman made when she was testifying to the january 6th committee about what it was like to have a president attacking her. she is central in this case. sure. and ruby freeman is i mean, the best american you could imagine. she is african american woman. decides to help her neighbors vote. that s what she is trying to do.