the blood alcohol content is much greater and pass point 0.08, it can be very significant, mercedes, colin, thank you so much for joining us tonight and thank you for watching news night. laura coates live starts right there good, evening, i m, jim acosta, infowars coates on this tuesday night, we begin with breaking news and that s so-called maga civil war in virginia s fifth congressional district. congressman bob good. tonight, the head of the ultra conservative house freedom caucus is fighting for his political career results in the primary there show i m neck and neck against his back challenger john maguire, the race at this point, you see it on your screen right now. it is too close to call. now a good loses, it will be a major win for donald trump. no doubt. but what if good pulls this one out? you saw those numbers a few moments ago, is close. what then after all, trump did try to put his finger on the scale in this race to try to exact revenge on good. the sin
shannon: if he s responding to the reports on fisa orders and we can t get our hands on them and the white house counsel may be trying to figure out if they happened. if he s responding to those and they could have been legitimate law enforcement objectives they could be legitimate documents. he didn t pluck them out of thin air. there s reports from the washington post and new york times that talk about the fact there were wiretapped communications given to the white house about trump administration communications with the russians. so this isn t he just threw out there. i think he could have been more detailed and precise with his language. there s a difference between a wiretap and surveillance and that s something he can ask his people in place to look at and clarify and something his justice department could have clarified so maybe he should have asked that before coming out on twitter but the idea it s out of the question given the vast evidence of the obama
Files with personal information out of the open internet. that s what keeps hackers from being able to use that to find exploits in systems. end to end user encryption is one of the best defenses that we have against huge cyber breaches. but if you re speaking from a law enforcement perspective, you want to be able to look into communications of groups like isis, then you don t want those encryptions. so what this really shows is that we at this moment we haven t figured out which threat we want to address yet and these two law enforcement objectives they re in conflict. all right. patrick tucker, thank you very much for your time. folk at the peptntagon are hoping to learn something from today s scare. more on that next. but first, fresh reaction from the floor of the new york stock exchange. i think that we really need to reevaluate our entire system to begin with, our financial system, our monetary system. it s not working for the majority of people to begin with. certainly th
Than wrong. let me make a few points because it s an issue i hope the committee takes seriously. first of all, you have to remember that when we talk about the state department and diplomatic facilities, that covers, we are the umbrella for so many other agencies in our government. if we were not there, many of those agencies representatives would have a difficult time being there. i mean we are the diplomatic presence that permits us to pursue law enforcement objectives, intelligence objectives. military objectives and so much more. so this is not just us saying do we want the diplomats at risk? what are the equities of the rest of the government that would be effective if we decided we had to close shop because the risk was too great? i want to stress that, because i don t think you can
That we can get it more right than wrong. let me just make a few points because it s an issue i hope this committee takes very seriously. first of all you ve got to know when we talk about the state department and diplomatic facilities, that covers we are the umbrella for so many other agencies in our government. if we were not there, many of those agencies representatives would have a difficult time being there. i mean, we are the diplomatic presence that permits us to pursue law enforcement objectives, intelligence objectives, military objectives, and so much more. so it s not just about us sitting around and saying you know, do we really want our diplomats at risk? it s okay, what are the equities of the rest of the government that would be asktsed if we decided we had to close shop