whatever one thinks of that particular president, the fact does congress does not typically question or subpoena presidents. this ain t england. the legislature does not question the president the way you would see in the sessions they hold with the legislature. but tonight the news is that might change. there s solid reporting that the house is eyeing trump himself as the january 6th committee is meeting behind closed doors, weighing what you see here the certainly costly potential clash over trying to make trump testify as well as pursuing an interview with pence. now, going to trump would surely take a subpoena and then a court battle over it. the wall street journal reporting all this. and trump spent his whole career resisting these kinds of moves. we know that. sometimes he prevails. sometimes he loses. there have been court losses that forced him into the taped deposition see here on your screen. that only came after he was forced into that situation. that was also
This paper presents work undergone for a set of four high-rise towers, featuring 11,136 unique cold-bentpanels, hundreds of which are pushed beyond 250mm.
it and that they could be subject to all kinds of penalties? it s not up to a state to decide whether they can go against federal law. and, secondly, congress has clearly spoken and said, no, in this type of situation, federal law is going to control. so there are many ways in which state law can conflict with mtala and the state law will prevail, but not when what is at issue here is in direct conflict with the core directive of mtala, which is that if a person comes into a hospital or birthing center with an emergency condition and the medically appropriate stabilizing condition is abortion, you must provide that treatment. a state can t decide to override that. they can sue and try to claim that there is another way of thinking about this issue of preemption, which law controls, federal or state. that s going to be a very tough argument to prevail on in this case and it might turn on how a
prosecution under afghan law. to date president karzai, currently in washington, has resisted this. joining us now, ambassador john bolton, former u.n. ambassador to the u.n. and fox news contributor. so, ambassador bolton, president karzai says this, give us a good army, a good air force and the capability to project afghan interests in the region and then, only then will you get your immunity. what do you think about that? well i think that is a losing proposition for hamid karzai. it s a losing proposition for is too. look, this legal question of immunity may sound kind of abstract and technical but it s absolutely critical. the united states is not going to put its armed forces or its diplomats or its contractors under afghan law. they are representing sovereign american interests and our law controls. that s a point we have insisted on around the world for years. now this is a bargaining position by hamid karzai.
law enforcement agencies to do anything regarding this case yet. aid refer you to the new york city police department, but s true that russian law controls whether an individual located in russia can be transferred to the united states to face prosecution. want to bring in jay salt peter, a former nypd homicide detective, 20 years, 20 years on the force, now a private investigator in new york. jay what do you know? what has new york police been able to piece together about what happened in that brooklyn apartment last weekend? well, i m sure the state department is going to hear very shortly from the police department. right now, they are just tying up all the loose ends, getting it ready for the prosecution part of this case and then they will contact the state department. without a doubt, i mean, between video and between eyewitnesses, they have placed the boyfriend there and i m sure within the apartment forensically, he is you know, they have plenty of forensic work, because