allowed to have an opinion. if people want to believe meghan markle, that s entirely their right. into this heady brew, britain launched a new experiment, partly inspired by america. and while piers was busy throwing a fit before he quit, the all white teenybopper trump fan club was getting equally hysterical about the interview. in the us, cable news is no longer regulated. it prioritises personality and opinion in prime time slots, from the liberal msnbc, to the right wing fox news. britain still has a broadcast regulator, 0fcom, but is moving in the same direction. more than 30 years after he was the launch chairman of sky, former sunday times editor and ex bbc broadcaster andrew neil played the same role for the new gb news, pitched as a centre right antidote to established broadcasters. will we be different from the existing networks? yes! because they all do the same thing.
into this heady brew, britain launched a new experiment, partly inspired by america. and while piers was busy throwing a fit before he quit, the all white teenybopper trump fan club was getting equally hysterical about the interview. in the us, cable news is no longer regulated. it prioritises personality and opinion in prime time slots, from the liberal msnbc, to the right wing fox news. britain still has a broadcast regulator, ofcom, but is moving in the same direction. more than 30 years after he was the launch chairman of sky, former sunday times editor and ex bbc broadcaster andrew neil played the same role for the new gb news, pitched as a centre right antidote to established broadcasters. will we be different from the existing networks? yes! because they all do the same thing. so what s the point of doing what they do? will we cover stories
to the right wing fox news. britain still has a broadcast regulator, ofcom, but is moving in the same direction. more than 30 years after he was the launch chairman of sky, former sunday times editor and ex bbc broadcaster andrew neil played the same role for the new gb news, pitched as a centre right antidote to established broadcasters. will we be different from the existing networks? yes! because they all do the same thing. so what s the point of doing what they do? will we cover stories a different way? yes! will we give voices to people outside the metropolitan consensus? yes! do we have an interest in fox news? no! disinformation? no! conspiracy theories? no! oh, man alive, why would you argue. gb news will exploit the subtle but significant distinction between impartiality within programmes, and balance across a network that the likes of radio station lbc have navigated.
sometimes, it boils over. but yet you continue to trash her. - ok, i m done with this! broadcaster piers morgan left itv, unwilling to apologise for saying he didn t believe meghan s claims. the next morning, morgan was bullish. no, i believe in freedom of speech. i believe in the right to be allowed to have an opinion. if people want to believe meghan markle, that s entirely their right. into this heady brew, britain launched a new experiment, partly inspired by america. and while piers was busy throwing a fit before he quit, the all white teenybopper trump fan club was getting equally hysterical about the interview. in the us, cable news is no longer regulated. it prioritises personality and opinion in prime time slots, from the liberal msnbc, to the right wing fox news. britain still has a broadcast regulator, 0fcom, but is moving in the same direction. more than 30 years after he was the launch chairman of sky, former sunday times editor
into this heady brew, britain launched a new experiment, partly inspired by america. and while piers was busy throwing a fit before he quit, the all white teenybopper trump fan club was getting equally hysterical about the interview. in the us, cable news is no longer regulated. it prioritises personality and opinion in prime time slots, from the liberal msnbc, to the right wing fox news. britain still has a broadcast regulator, ofcom, but is moving in the same direction. more than 30 years after he was the launch chairman of sky, former sunday times editor and ex bbc broadcaster andrew neil played the same role for the new gb news, pitched as a centre right antidote to established broadcasters. will we be different from the existing networks? yes! because they all do the same thing. so what s the point of doing what they do? will we cover stories a different way? yes! will we give voices to people outside the metropolitan consensus?