More details coming up. The u. S. Secretary of state is in london with talks with Prime Minister Boris Johnson. We will have a live report from the british capitol. Good to have you with us. Well, after months of politicizing the issue, u. S. President donald trump appears to be finally endorsing masks. Mr. Trump tweeted a photo of himself wearing a mask and described it as a patriotic act. He also plans to restart the coronavirus briefings today. It may be an effort to revive his Approval Ratings after a failed response to the pandemic. The coronavirus cases are still spiking in at least 31 u. S. States and the death toll has topped 140,000 people. Thats according to Johns Hopkins university. Despite nearly 52,000 new cases on monday, there have been massive testing delays. A top u. S. Lab says covid19 test results are lagging by up to two weeks in some cases. Theres promising news from three vaccine trials. There is evidence they can produce immune responses to protect people against
struggling to make it through high school because she has the dream that she s going to do something nobody else in her family been able to do. she had that inside of her since she was five years old. she s going to break out. she s the one going to be stuck and mississippi or alabama or louisiana or texas. she s going to have to make the decision that could kill her. this is not melo-drama. this is reality if this court ignores 50 years of precedents. it won t happen one time. it will happen over and over and over again across this american landscape. what caitlin flanagan did was the thing i was so upset of not happening yesterday in that
that something to watch as the evolution of the court, i am most curious of how well do you think the opposing council did in presenting the case that this would destroy precedents. this is going to stand, that s what s going to get justice kavanaugh and other conservative judges to side with the institutionaists and destroying the precedent is legally damaging. i thought the lawyers are fantastic. this was not in this situation where the lawyers did not come and deliberate from they stuck the the law and the points and they stuck to the points, they are briefed. i thought they handled the question effectively in trying to explain, it s about a woman s freedom and her autonomy. these two things are not
willie geist has a question for you from new york. willie? sure. good morning, judge salas. i m so sorry, again, about your wonderful son, daniel, who you ve told us about in great detail over a couple of other visits here. i m curious because i think some people watching at home may be wondering what keeps her going. if you lost your son, you almost lost your husband because of the work you do, what gets you up. faith is the first thing that has been holding mark and i up since this happened and our faith in god. the other thing is daniel daniel loved what i stood for, the first latina district court judge in new jersey, daniel loved his mom and daniel loved that in this great country his mom, who was raised by a single
institutionalist and here is what justice sotomayor had to be getting at. you had two judges going through difficult and politicized hearings. we saw what happened with republicans just out now lying about the rules of putting justices on the supreme court. they did what they could do legally. that does not mean there is not a shadow that s cast on this court right now that makes overturning a 50-year precedent that only 27% of americans won t overturn. that much more of a black eye for this institution. that s something i wonder about whether the process, the confirmation process almost radicalizes judges going into assuming the bench and puts them in a political camp because they are forced into that wing and so