Reporter what did you think . We did not know until afterwards what happened. Reporter how are you feeling . Not good. Apparently there was some shooting going on. One of the bullets, it came off the foot of the vehicle and went in the hood of the vehicle and went in. Straight in. It broke through the window. The bullet was in the backseat of my car. Reporter neighbors tell us this used to be a quiet community, but drugs and gangs have spilled over. Now, drivebys and and are not uncommon. Ed now, Surveillance Video that you have to see. A robber armed with a knife goes after a fall river store clerk. That clerk grabs his own knife and battles back. Newscenter 5 s Reid Lamberty is ve talked to that clerk this evening . Reid he keeps the knife for his protection. He admits that he was scared. He says he did what he did to save his own life. From calm to chaos in the time it takes for this knife wielding criminal to jump the counter. He said, give me money , give me money. I was so scared
all of you coming to talk about the book today. the case he talks about is about a man sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole for 50 years were steeling $153 videotapes from a k-mart store. he received the prosecution even though he never had committed a felony. california is the only state in the country where a person can receive a life sentence for shoplifting. after he received this sentence, he appealed the california court of appeals on the ground it was cruel and unusual punishment. they denieded review. he then wanted to go to federal court and the rid of habeas corpus and being held in constitution by the laws of the united states. his claim was that the sentences was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth amendment. there s no right to a lawyer in federal court with habeas corpus if convicted in state court even if which was a capitol case. he lost. the judge rejected his claim. he then filed an appeal on his own to the federal co
[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] thank you, ladies and gentlemen. if we could remember to turn off our cell phones, that would be excellent. this is not only one of arizona s most important cultural event, but as many authors will tell you, it s bun the best festivals in the country. this is something we can all be proud of. the weather outside today is nearly perfect, a reminder of what makes tucson so special this time of year, but the fact that hundreds come inside to participate in this conversation about the constitution is a reminder of what makes this special. we. to give we want to give c-span for televising this event. they are one the best channels on tv today. [applause] for lawyers in the room, they need no introduction. they use the standard textbook on constitutional law when they were law students. they could still be recoving from that 1300 page odyssey. [laughter] he wears a number of hats. hehe is a devoted teacher and mentor. he has r
trade off between openness, avoiding things, and not having sort of effective mechanism to produce certain kinds of content that requires a lot of economic regulatory, whatever protection. an example that brings to my mind, although i don t think this will be that persuasive to you is your own field of legal scholarship, which, it sits inside this huge structure of legal licensing and 10 year intuition. if you felt legal scholarship were precious, and if you, arguably there ll be no legal scholarship reduce because there would be the means to produce it. is that a price worth paying or is there some sort of backdoor way of getting, we are interested in journalism, the reporting done and all that in a world that really privileges diversity of opinion and diversity of power. so the question is whether we should always accept artificial barriers essentially on the market or, in order to preserve things that we admire. i would say so but i would say we overdo it. a lot. the leg