happens. today we went out and spoke with several former federal prosecutors each of whom said they couldn t come up with a single example where a judge has actually tossed a recent federal conviction because of a perjury trap. what you see more often is real personal are. take the oj case, defense attorney johnny cochran used the case to put the lapd on trial. and he said that there were officers who used racial epithets. and the lapd had to admit that because an officer personurgere himself. here s was that famous perjury moment. and you say on your oath that you have not addressed any black person as a [ bleep ] or spoken about black people as [ bleep ] in the past ten years, detective thurman? that s what i m saying, sir. so if anybody comes to this
how am i going to answer this? it effects testimony. cameras should never be allowed. you won the civil case. no cameras in that civil case. there were cameras in the criminal case. could you have won the cripple case with the cameras? i don t think the cameras dictated the verdict in the criminal case but it detracted from the graff to us situation of the trial and it turned into a circus. with that atmosphere i think the jury had no problem returning the verdict they did under those circumstances. it didn t have the feel of a double homicide trial as the case progressed. he s a very narcissistic person. he s the true definition of a sociopath. do you think of nicole any more? like 50,000 bonus points when i spent $5,000
black jurors. you can put la counsel out there they have done this and that. she wanted to stick to the core blood evidence. she knew this was lapd on trial. this was going to be the fuhrman trial. racist la cops right after rodney king. all of this was going to be put on and she knew that. she wanted to stick to the blood evidence. if you put this evidence on you are going to have to put on these la cops. oddly during the 2004 interview simpson told me he thought detective lang would ultimately help him. i thought lang would be my salvation. once you write a book together you make an income from it you compromise yourself. i had much worse defiant
in el pass toe. now back to greta investigates o.j. simpson. when o.j. simpson was arrested for the murder of ex-wife nicole and ron goldman the police department was almost in as much in the hot seat as the football star. the rides that followed that judgment still haunted la. has the trial got underway the names of mark fuhrman became almost as recognizable as o.j. simpson. they knew it was him and never looked at any one else. the accusation of a corrupt cop slanted dna evidence to brand simpson. one of the allegations and tom can also speak to this is
you are going to put l.a. cops out there and they have done, this they have done that no, shemented to stick strictly to the core blood evidence. she knew, again, this was l.a.p.d. on trial. this was going to be the fuhrman trial. these are the racist l.a. cops. this is right after rodney king. all of this was going to be put on and she knew that so she wanted to stick to the core blood evidence because if you put this evidence on, you are going to have to put on these l.a. cops. these evidence planting, racist lying l.a. cops, going to have to testify to all this stuff. oddly, during the 2004 interview, simpson told me thought detective lang would ultimately help him. you know, i thought los lange had integrity. i thought he would be my salvation even since the trial. you know, once you write a book together and you make an income from it, i think he compromised himself. i don t really have i have much worse, if i had feelings with vannatter than