Live Breaking News & Updates on Language Access Office
Stay updated with breaking news from Language access office. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Were back in Public SessionSan FranciscoEthics Commission month to month for february 23, 2015, having been in closed session the Commission Vote not to disclose the concept of the closed session other than to say that it voted and requested that supervisor farrell file a response no matter march 15 inform the commission forfeiture letter served on him. Pardon me. That needs to be voted on. I so moved mr. Chair. Second any Public Comment . There being no Public Comment commissioners have comments before we start to vote call for a vote all in favor, say i. I. Opposed carried 4 to nothing turning next to item 9 discussion and possible action on the min ....
The ethics laws were out dated or confusing and not inadequately addressing the regulations so the Ethics Commission spent the last 11 months discussing this with the public and city officials and legal experts cross california proposition e is a result i urge you not reimpact any of the confusions of prop j. Any other Public Comment all in favor of the motion. I. I. Opposed the motion is passed turning to 5 which is environment as a penalty. Commissioner. This proposal the idea is to add a penalty for violations of the campaign refinance ordinance for those who are city contractors and so the proposal is to debarment it prohibits persons who might do business with the city and county of San Francisco from doing so or bidding on the contract for a certain determined period of time if they were to violate c from or prop ....
Mailers involving the San Francisco candidates by moving it to ethics you have that access its a observe that disclosure. Any other Public Comment . All right. All in favor i. Opposed passed unanimously 4, 0 now weve gone through the items item one 2, and 4 directed the staff 67 as well but 67 is a more straightforward but directed the staff to take some further action and i would ask, sir how would you prioritize those recognizing theres a fairly heavy burden where should he start and just give me a week i know that the fcc has their regulatory calendar it makes sense that seemed the commission very much want us to move on item one we can draft the proposed language and begin our i p month to month and gathering records we could come back to you with that language in march and in march present a proposed calendar in terms of how we will go about doing this ill recommend we ex ....
Down and find out the slate mailers involving the San Francisco candidates by moving it to ethics you have that access its a observe that disclosure. Any other Public Comment . All right. All in favor i. Opposed passed unanimously 4, 0 now weve gone through the items item one 2, and 4 directed the staff 67 as well but 67 is a more straightforward but directed the staff to take some further action and i would ask, sir how would you prioritize those recognizing theres a fairly heavy burden where should he start and just give me a week i know that the fcc has their regulatory calendar it makes sense that seemed the commission very much want us to move on item one we can draft the proposed language and begin our i p month to month and gathering records we could come back to you with that language in march and in march present a proposed calendar in terms of how we will go about do ....
Commissioner. This proposal the idea is to add a penalty for violations of the campaign refinance ordinance for those who are city contractors and so the proposal is to debarment it prohibits persons who might do business with the city and county of San Francisco from doing so or bidding on the contract for a certain determined period of time if they were to violate c from or proportions of c from i understand it on a similar provision that was impacted by the voters in los angeles and so this is the general idea the one thing well note we note noted in the memo the debarment bent is a serious penalty that may or may not be warranted but other concerns with the contractors process those are taking a look at in los angeles when the Ethics Commission considers the severity of the violation and the effect and this is important i think the if effect of debarment on fiancees and ....