IN A win for Kuala Lumpur residents, the Federal Government has decided to cancel the proposed alienation of land surrounding the Bohol flood retention pond to a private developer.
millions of dollars in vacations and land deals that benefitted thomas family. what began as a story about secrets and disclosure that thomas hid all this is becoming now a wider scandal about whether clarence thomas may have broken other rules or the law, whether chief justice roberts and merrick garland at doj will do anything about it. or, is this biden appointee afraid? is there more than one washington scandal brewing? fact number one, the scale of the grift is large. take a look at this graphic we made. the money headed towards thomas in this entire grift dwarves his annual salary. fact two, thomas best we can tell misled just about everyone on this. he hid it, openly claimed in public that he prefers, well, rv parks to yachts. and he also claimed he upholds the idea on the court that right
court to sue police itself, which is ridiculous. the supreme court cannot police itself. it s proven that it can t police itself. asking it super nicely, oh, john, would you please police yourself right now, is down. when lisa happen is not asking the supreme court just police itself, we need to have congressional legislation to police the supreme court. that s not apparently what this hearing is all about. that s why i don t think that the invitation was ever going to go anywhere. of course, roberts doesn t want to show up. it s the kind of thing we re like, if you ask a high school football player who just, you know, just got accepted to texas a&m. hey buddy, you want to tell me about your new car? what s he gonna say? no, i m good, son. i do want to talk about my new car today. that s what roberts is right now. he doesn t want to talk about his life. he doesn t want to talk about his friends. he doesn t want to talk about harlan crow. he doesn t want to talk about land deals and boo
congressional authority over the power of the purse to bring these justices to heel. it is congress that controls supreme court funding. now, we have seen because of some of the drip drip drip of scandals that you mentioned, joy, we have seen that these nine people are probably able to live without their government salaries, right? between their land deals and book deals and their laundering money through their spouses, they probably don t need their government salaries, but i bet they like having a courthouse. i bet they like having clerks. i bet they like having access. i know they like having taxpayer funded security details. if congress starts taking those away, if congress puts the stick to these people and starts taking away some of their perks and some of their privileges, then i bet you the supreme court would see the virtue in submitting to independent ethics oversight. it is that or the highway. this ridiculousness of supreme court should police itself has
secretly pocketing millions of dollars, worse than having an outside job working for the federal government paid by our tax dollars and is taking land payments from the same donor who has links, which is relevant, to saving or honoring nazi memorabilia, including a hitler signed copy of mein kampf. is this acceptable it is not close to acceptable whether acceptable is, clarence thomas is on pluto look, you could argue perhaps i guess maybe that yacht trips and vacations were not required to be federally disclosed but there is no argument that land deals, that when this man is buying your property, that you do not have to disclose that under the law. 5 usc 13104 is the law that outlines public disclosure requirements for judges and