therefore very disrespectful. flan i therefore very disrespectful. can i ust sa , therefore very disrespectful. can i just say. those therefore very disrespectful. can i just say, those numbers - therefore very disrespectful. can i just say, those numbers are - therefore very disrespectful. can i just say, those numbers are created by the just say, those numbers are created by the treasury. there is very strict by the treasury. there is very strict rules by the treasury. there is very strict rules on how you can do opposition strict rules on how you can do opposition costing. if you think that the opposition costing. if you think that the treasury would just add up anything that the treasury would just add up anything that tory special advisers .ave anything that tory special advisers gave them, no matter what it was, had come gave them, no matter what it was, had come out with a vigour, which is backed had come out with a vigour, which is backed by had come out with
have given their assessment thus far. the point about the £2000 is that the assumptions on which the calculations are based have been made by tory special advisers, by political appointees. they are not impartial or independent, which is what rishi sunak was claiming on the programme. i do what rishi sunak was claiming on the ttroramme. ., ., ~ programme. i do not think it matters- programme. i do not think it matters. the programme. i do not think it matters. the truth programme. i do not think it matters. the truth does - programme. i do not think it - matters. the truth does not matter? the truth matters matters. the truth does not matter? the truth matters and matters. the truth does not matter? the truth matters and that matters. the truth does not matter? the truth matters and that will- matters. the truth does not matter? the truth matters and that will be i the truth matters and that will be examined and come out, but the bottom line is the people that watch that d
audience. let s start with you, liz kendall, why did it take so long for keir starmer to rebut that figure of £2000? i keir starmer to rebut that figure of £2000? “ keir starmer to rebut that figure of £2000? 4 ., , keir starmer to rebut that figure of £2000? ~ .,, . . ., keir starmer to rebut that figure of £2000? ~ . . ., . ., £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are not £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are not going £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are not going to £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are not going to be - £2000? i think he was crystal clear that we are not going to be raisingl that we are not going to be raising taxes on working people, but that we will be closing tax loopholes and the non dom tax status to fund the extra appointments we need in the nhs, to cut waiting times. we will be getting rid of the tax breaks enjoyed by private schools to fund more teach
London Playbook: In poor health — You re kidding — Happy (?) New Year – POLITICO politico.eu - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from politico.eu Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.