Stay updated with breaking news from Kyiv kyiv. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
To declare suspicion, the verdict in this case will not be taken away, i am sure of it. It was the Program Collaborators and i, olena kononenko. If you have information about the kremlin sellers, write to us at this email address or simply on facebook, together we will send all the traitors after the russian ship. See you in a week on espresso. See this week in the program judicial control with tatyana shustrova. Another bribe from themidi. How the Police Detained judge burhan. Receipt of funds by the persons involved was documented. But why did the Supreme Court lower the quality of judging judges. The Higher Commission throws the qualifications into the trash. All those facts about judges, their dishonesty, their property. See in thursday, may 2, at 5 45 ....
Opinion, no Ukrainian Military man who defends this land should bear responsibility for the actions he takes within the framework of the law and which are aimed at protecting the homeland. My client acted solely within the scope of his authority and acted solely to protect the homeland. Itself operation on a russian plane, its ultimate goal was a russian plane, having received which, ukraine would be able to. Firstly, to finalize its aircraft, the last of which was produced back in 1991, and secondly, it would provide the direct allies with a sample of this aircraft, this aircraft would be disassembled into tiny details, and we would understand how and what russia in it embeds, why is it important . Russia is constantly waging wars, russia has been shelling syria since 2014, they are constantly improving their planes and in general their military sphere and bringing them there corrections and we have to access that in order to ....
Allowed, er, what is the point of the case, what is the Evidence Base of the prosecution . Look, in my opinion, i dont see any Evidence Base for the prosecution at all. The only thing that was done, it was the side of the prosecution artificially created two military examinations. How was it done . In his report, the sbu employee writes one of the servicemen reported the presence of servicemen at the kanatove airfield. And techniques, the investigator rewrites all this in his decision on the appointment of an expert examination, and the experts take it as a fact that yes, someone reported, there is no evidence for this, no person, no witness, no document testifies that at least someone reported that at that moment on there will be equipment at the airfield, there will be military personnel at the airfield, all the more concentrated in one place in order to shoot down a russian ....
The Evidence Base of the prosecution . Look, in my opinion, i dont see any Evidence Base for the prosecution at all. The only thing that was done, it was the prosecution artificially created two military examinations. How was it done . In his report, the sbu employee writes one of the servicemen reported the presence of servicemen and equipment at the kanatove airfield. The investigator rewrites all this in. His decision on the appointment of an expert examination, and the experts take it as a fact, that yes, someone reported, there is no evidence for this, no person, no witness, no document testifies that at least someone reported that at that moment on there will be equipment at the airfield, there will be military personnel at the airfield, all the more concentrated in one place in order to meet the russian plane, no, this is all a fiction, this is all based on the convictio ....