blm. oh, i have. it s alive. it s alive. wow. our job is to creep the cup always wet because other wise it link other you re putting wine. oh, i see, i see. i would like to have this in my in. can you ? i never sthuf. not nothing anything about it made me learn really faster. yeah. wine is like, a suckly if
Lots of people implicated by the testimony. john i wanted i want to read part wlaf ambassador sondland said last we can. said inviting a foreign government to undertake investigations for the purpose of influencing an upcoming u.s. election would be wrong. withholding other than aid to pressure a foreign government to take such steps would be wrong. i did not and would not frp participate in such undertakings. now, according to taylor s testimony today, i mean that s exactly what he did at the behest the president trump. certainly sounds that way, anderson. what we have here to me is most striking about taylor s testimony. he is describing a conspiracy in operation. and they he glets a lit of information about what is what is going on. but he certainly doesn t become a coconspiratorer and doesn t like what he learns about that conspiracy. so i think that it s also striking that the justice department is ignoring this whole conspiracy, which is in a
It s up to john bolton. the official policy of the white house outlined in the letter from the council was no one can talk ever to congress about this. but we have seen in people like taylor s testimony that a lot of people are ignoring that instruction and we ll have to see whether bolton will. many of the many fascinating aspects of the testimony today was that it raised the possibility of so many more people testifying, including bolton. including mike pence. william barr, the toernl attorney general. lots of people implicated by the testimony. john i wanted i want to read part wlaf ambassador sondland said last we can. said inviting a foreign government to undertake investigations for the purpose of influencing an upcoming u.s. election would be wrong. withholding foreign aide to pressure a foreign government to take such steps would be wrong. i did not and would not
Understand where you re coming from you want information. but slow the roll a little bit here. it could be the opposite. it could be i had these people come to me who want to talk to you. don t feel comfortable because wlaf mike pompeo said. i want to help. it could be either way. we don t know. and you know one of the broader questions about in impeachment investigation in its entirety is will the trump administration allow anyone from any party of of government, from the white house, justice department, state department to testify? because as the oversight committees have been going forward, basically they haven t. they have stonewalled almost everything. it s effective. it s effective. and the congress has had to go to court. which is a very laborious process, slow not resolved. and the democrats want in to be relatively quick. and the one thing that s different from the oversight problems versus impeachment is that the members of the
They be safe and sanitary. the trump administration interprets that as not even having to need tooth brushes. they actually went to court and said that safe and sanitary does not mean including tooth brushes. and so that s their interpretation wlaf safe and sand marry era tear is. that s why we needed to provide those guidelines as to what actual humane treatment in the detention centers really actually means. and that s why we had other provisions. for instance, that niece funds have to go. no, no, i totally hear you. it comes down to if time is of the essence talking about a ticking time bomb some money thrown at it that might be crass how i m say going. but some money is better than nothing and that s what we hear from nancy pelosi and a group of laurms. so much more is needed this ig report is stretching appear something has to give and i hope the definition of safe and