know it s not. that precedent applies, and i listened to the debate about precedent. well, precedent is the way we go, dread scott is the case. plessy v. ferguson, separate by equal. korematsu, they don t mean precedent stands forever, they mean the precedent they like stands forever, but we rarely have here, a perfect time, rarely have a discussion about the constitution, the job of a supreme court justice have we now reached a point at the hearings so destroyed since robert bork in 1987 where it s a matter of the left saying here s our agenda, if you don t support our agenda, you re not going on the supreme court? it was like watching two different hearings back weeks ago when they were discussing the nomination in good faith. you had a bunch of people asking about brett kavanaugh s constitutional understanding, his jurisprudence. there were really interesting discussions about his view of different amendments and different approaches to the
know it s not. that precedent applies, and i listened to the debate about precedent. well, precedent is the way we go, dread scott is the case. plessy v. ferguson, separate by equal. korematsu, they don t mean precedent stands forever, they mean the precedent they like stands forever, but we rarely have here, a perfect time, rarely have a discussion about the constitution, the job of a supreme court justice have we now reached a point at the hearings so destroyed since robert bork in 1987 where it s a matter of the left saying here s our agenda, if you don t support our agenda, you re not going on the supreme court? it was like watching two different hearings back weeks ago when they were discussing the nomination in good faith. you had a bunch of people asking about brett kavanaugh s constitutional understanding, his jurisprudence. there were really interesting discussions about his view of different amendments and different approaches to the
know it s not. that precedent applies, and i listened to the debate about precedent. well, precedent is the way we go, dread scott is the case. plessy v. ferguson, separate by equal. korematsu, they don t mean precedent stands forever, they mean the precedent they like stands forever, but we rarely have here, a perfect time, rarely have a discussion about the constitution, the job of a supreme court justice have we now reached a point at the hearings so destroyed since robert bork in 1987 where it s a matter of the left saying here s our agenda, if you don t support our agenda, you re not going on the supreme court? it was like watching two different hearings back weeks ago when they were discussing the nomination in good faith. you had a bunch of people asking about brett kavanaugh s constitutional understanding, his jurisprudence. there were really interesting discussions about his view of different amendments and different approaches to the