asking congress not to include hundreds of millions for more c-17 jets and for an alternate backup engine. even getting president obama threatening to veto if the funding is the defense bill. nor is ron paul the only tea partiers to extend the the benefits. any tea partier who says something else lacks integrity. cue sarah palin. the tea party blogger posting on facebook last week, this administration may be willing to cut defense spending but it s increasing it every where else. we should do it the other way rornd, cut spending in other departments apart from the defense. they aided and abetted by saber rattles here and abroad. united air rack emirates ambassador to the u.s. today calling on the u.s. to launch a third war against iran because or else the united arab emirates
state-of-the-art fence and send troops to the border and want to secure that border, it will cost $100 billion, you tell me republicans where you re going to take that out of the defense budget. take it out of afghanistan, take it out of iraq. if you want to spend it, fine. i think the president could call their bluff that way. why doesn t he do that? why isn t there another request for time later in this week? i don t know. but i think that s the way you got to do at them, it seems to me. you have to play their game better than they do. what does the president have in mind? do you have any idea? to get some grand compromise somewhat to the right of where the mccain/kennedy bill was. the schumer bill that they re working off, the chuck schumer bill is really much, you know, more to the conservatives liking than the one of a few years ago. it s the conserve difs like lindsey graham and the others refuse to play ball. it s very difficult for the
with me. thanks for coming in tonight. 45 billion annually and it goes to the industry the most profitable of all industries. if the government changes anything in the wake of this, would, in fact, the most useful thing for society changing this and then addressing some of the eco-logical problem science. it might be one of the most useful thing, if one of the least likely things they will do. in the middle of depression the oil industry is one of the few areas of the economy doing well. they want to keep that going. they make a lot of money off the leases and they want to keep that coming in. that s the argument that they made to appeals court, it it told them that the bush rules were ridiculous. they said we have to use those rules because we need the money. the peat moss story, if it could be impactful in any way, even with the stable water, which you could throw some in lake pontchartrain right now and help that situation to some degree, why is the government not telling bp to
parrots. now he supports electronic and above ground, and that s a stupid word thafsz put in for whoever is writing for our website. bus and website missed. time to call on washington editor for the nation chris hayes. good evening. good evening, keith. long sleeved shirt i see. i didn t have time to i didn t think i was big-time enough to rock that the way from congressman from massachusetts did. try it out. the angle engel first. this is heavy stuff. i don t want to pound a cliche into the ground. but it s to threaten to sue to keep your old quotes off the sp internet? it s stupid. you don t want to put press attention on what the old positions are. by initiating a story that s going to motivate a whole another news cycle or two or three depending on how the reid camp responds, you ensure everyone is talking about it. i don t know if it s stubbornness or a rookie amateur
weapon, you lose. we can t concede to the defense establishment the need for america to be everywhere and protect everybody. once you concede that you fight a losing battle. let s protect our national security interests and be available for the few democratic allies that are menaced. that doesn t involve most of the our spending and most of our military bases. we have military bases, and jones makes his point. hundreds of bases in 38 countries that do not in most of that cases advance american security. of course, you and i both agree we have not only wasted a trillion dollars in iraq, but damaged america in the process. so we paid a trillion dollars to lose american lives and damage our ability to influence the world in a constructive way. well put in the issue of foreign military aid. congressman barney frank from massachusetts. it s a pleasure, sir. thanks for your time. thank you, keith. sharon engel compares himself to a former american political figure and it s not sue loud