Handful of swing states, its potentially those specific voters who will decide who wince. But maybe a better question to ask, who is the voter who voted for donald trump in 2020 but does not want to vote for him again in 2024. The New York Times and nbc have identified a batch of these very voters as have election pac Republican Voters against trump. Heres what some of them have to say. For the first time in over 50 year of voting in president ial elections, i will not vote republican. Im a twotime trump voter. Donald trump has shown that he has no regard for the laws of this country. Biden may not have policy that i agree with, but i know that democracy will be saved under biden. I voted for trump in the past elections. I cannot do it now. Trump is a gutless coward. Who would last five minutes in a combat zone. His character does not suit the presidency. I will no longer be voting for President Trump. Because trump wants to act like a dictator. At first listen, it sounds like great ne
that s haunted law enforcement for over a decade. back in 2010 and 2011, new york authorities discovered 11 sets of human remains strewn along a suburban long island beach highway. he woman has been arrested in connection with the first four murders. their bodies were all found in burlap sacks along the beach in december 2010. another six women and a toddler were found in the following months, w womenice will see a fe. had any connection to those killings. today, he pleaded not guiltyd to six murder counts. officials say they won t stop unti ml. they solve all the killings. vacuuming is a demon that walks among us. a predator that ruined families. if not for the members of this task force. he will still be on the streets today. however, even with this arrest ,we re not done. cops linking him to murder through dna left on a discarded pizza box. the accused was an architect,hei married with a daughter and a stepson and his neighborth a dae stunned. the guy s been
they feel very good about this but there are very serious questions to wonder about this as they try to figure out they work around these spacewalks. they have going on up there. they can stay up there for quite some time. it s not like the clock is running out really fast. but you know, there have to be serious questions here about is there any inherent danger and bringing it back do they have the autonomous ability to bring the spacecraft back? this one back without these people on board. and then somehow change the entire schedule to get those two back later on. this is more serious than it appears older to be fair. nasa and boeing are trying to say right now, they re working through it. they hope it s not serious at all all right. tom. form. and thank you so much. a new our cnn news central starts right now. three days to go until earliest presidential debate in general election in history. it is right here on cnn every minute between now and then counts a pro
Analysis and discussion of the days top stories and compelling issues from Lawrence ODonnell. Analysis and discussion of the days top stories and compelling issues from Lawrence ODonnell. Will decide if the president is likely to sit with Robert Mueller for an interview while at bedminster. But it might not be Donald Trumps decision to make, admitting that trump might be, quote, forced to testify on matters that occurred before he took office and that might mean real legal jeopardy for the president. That admission comes as we are learning new details about the trump mayor relationship. Bloomberg reports that the day after he interviewed Robert Mueller to be the Deputy Director of the fbi trump was in an Office Meeting when it was announced that mueller was announced to be the lead investigator of the campaign. Trump and Attorney General jeff session were blind sided according to a person familiar with both meetings. Trump blasted session for not knowing the announcement was coming and
then a novel legal concept goess against not one but two separate supreme court decisions. and that s a short1 bu2 sepa. it todd blanche. i want you to respond to all a wllt. look, we we knew this wass a problem the day that the indictment was handeled. t so it wasn t april 15th that wed realized that we had we re up ta against a battle that would be virtually impossible to win. that happeneuld a year ago.e and we ve been fighting this case for over a yearover a y wie judge, with the district attorney, trying to understand anttorney what there, underlying crimes were. and we got no answer. we really got nower. answer untl the trial started. think about that. and it turns that the crime that was charged, the original crimes, a misdemeanoe orr, bumpf up to a felony if it s supposed to cover up another crime. the otheto cover crime that wasd being covered up was another misdemeanor, anotherr misd misdemeanor, a state law election violation that required unlawful means. and that s where