the review that i hope we will be finished with soon. there will be more detail that time. coming as the new sent letters to the white house counsel s office and national archives trying to get information on biden s handling of classified documents. i want to bring in senior political columnist, a political, jonathan martin. and cnn political commentator, carl finney, and david irvine is with us as well. i m glad to have you all here, what are you thinking right now? because look. this is not the news or the way i think president biden wanted to start the new year or the new congress. i am sure there was a bit of rumbling, and the dysfunction that was happening with the republicans, last, week with the speakers vote. but, the fact of the matter is, he s got to contend with this. what do you take out of it? well, two things, one is the circumstances are different and obviously his folks called when they realize they had classified documents there, which is the right thing
video to drop on tuesday. white house team reporting that he reported parts of this video 2 weekends ago. now laura, the first question is why can t the president do a reelection announcement live? what is it take weeks to record it? tonight, we have secured something so special video of some of the president s attempts at his relaunch. watch this. american is a nation that could be defined in a single word. excuse me, i got a frog in my throat. we know there s no such thing, there is so much more to finish the job. half in the women in my administration are women. you lost your child. you lost your child.
photographers, she was fine. she was stoic. she was nodding her head a little bit when things were said that she agreed with and, of course, shaking her head when things she didn t agree with were spoken about in court. so she didn t say a whole lot didn t show too much emotion, but yeah, she did a fine job in there. and what happens next? yes so we re going to see how long this trial actually takes. of course, they set aside a certain amount of time. we re looking at a week to two weeks here, but you never know exactly how long a triable take. we want to see if she takes the stand. we ve been told that she will. we ve been told that some of her family members will but again as a trial goes forward, you never know what could happen. what sort of developments will see in the days and weeks or a couple of weeks to come? but we ll be back. they re coming up tomorrow morning at nine a.m. to see this second day of the of testimony. okay lincoln graves. thank you very much for giving us all
mission. tell me about this particular avenue as a way to go at these companies. well good evening laura. thank you so much for having me on your show. i really appreciated. you know if you want to summarize this lawsuit, there is a mental health crisis among kids caused by social media companies. and these lawsuits in the for social media companies stop praying on kids and help schools pay for the mental health services that students now need because of the actions of the social media companies. so the technical legal claim is the public nuisance lawsuit. but the goal is outdated, and it s twofold, it s the number one to change the behavior about the defendants. and it s also to get the resources you need to obey the nuisance. in this case, you know the mental health issues that are confronting both the seattle public schools and the can school district. and in terms of abatement, if this is a successful lawsuit, is that what the money would go to if you were to win this