a mistrial in his sexual assault case. welcome, and to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. starting with: the observer claims that the government repeatedly failed to act on fire safety warnings before the fire at grenfall tower. the express leads with the queen s response to the fire, praising her majesty for calming the nation. the sunday mirror labels the duke of cambridge the ‘prince of compassion‘ for the role he played in responding to the fire. the sunday telegraph says theresa may could face a leadership challenge from within her own party if she waters down brexit. the sunday times reports that senior conservative figures have told the prime minister she has ten days to improve her performance or face a confidence vote in the party. let‘s begin with a little bit more in depth look. all of the papers focusing on the terrible tragedy in west london. the sunday telegraph is talking about the response, the initial response, being simply
An inquiry produces a report. there is no requirement for the government to carry out the recommendations it made, no requirement even for there to be public scrutiny of which recommendations are followed and why. often it s left to the public and to the press to follow up on the recommendations that an inquiry s made as the chair goes back to the previous job and no longer has involvement in the inquiry. government would be very happy in many instances to not have to implement an inquiry s recommendations and if it s termed a whitewash, then that relieves the pressure on the government to implement then and can lead to very little change in the wake of an inquiry. history is full of what missed opportunities can mean. recommendations about emergency service radios made by the public inquiry into the king s cross fire, for example, hadn t been acted on by the time of thejuly 7 bombings almost 20 years later. but even if the public interpret this newjudicial review as the government hol