Kim I Mar News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Kim i mar. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Kim I Mar Today - Breaking & Trending Today
This where you could have made public comment. On item 50 supervisor kim you do have comments, supervisor kim . I wanted to explain my vote prior to. I think if we had more time i would have come to understand from the parameters of being comfortable to vote for this item. I think given the information that i have now if we are forced to take a vote then ill have to take a no vote, but i dont want to take that as being perceived as me being against an em program that could work, i have some questions id like to ask and get a better understanding from the chief in terms of his categorical opposition, instead of hearing it is. Im sorry were not going to have an continuance today, but i have to vote no today not having all the questions to be all the answers to the questions that i have. Supervisor campos. Id like to ask that we move this item to the end of the agenda. Id like to hear from the chief of police what the basis of his opposition is. So i would like to ask that he come and tel ....
Filed against the city. Role call vote. Kim i, mar i, tang i, wiener i, yee i, breed i, campos i, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There are ten is. The ordinance is passed. Item 61. Approve the settlement of the unlitigated claims filed by the regents of university of california on december 15, 2010 and june 24, 120 20 13. Role call vote. On item 61 supervisor kim breed i, campos no, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There is nine is, one no. This resolution is adopted. Item 62. Rose lugs to approve the settlement of the claim filed the war ton school of pennsylvania against the city for approximately 66,000 filed on march 13 20shgs 13. Colleagues role call vote. Kick i, mar i, tang i, wiener i, yee i, breed i, campos i, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There are ten is. This resolution is adopted. Item 63. Item 63 was considered by land use and Economic Development and regular meeting on monday july 21 and forwarded to the board recommend ....
I, tang i, wiener no, yee i, campos i, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There is 8s, one no. The ordinance is passed in the first reading. Next item. Item 60 is ordinance to [inaudible] libraries and the coalition for a better north beach lie briar and playground filed against the city. Role call vote. Kim i, mar i, tang i, wiener i, yee i, breed i, campos i, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There are ten is. The ordinance is passed. Item 61. Approve the settlement of the unlitigated claims filed by the regents of university of california on december 15, 2010 and june 24, 120 20 13. Role call vote. On item 61 supervisor kim breed i, campos no, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. There is nine is, one no. This resolution is adopted. Item 62. Rose lugs to approve the settlement of the claim filed the war ton school of pennsylvania against the city for approximately 66,000 filed on march 13 20shgs 13. Colleagues role call vote. Kick i, mar i, tang i, wiener i, yee i, breed i, campos i, chiu i, cohen i, far ....
In this particular instance the obviously the next step is not to see whether or not they comply with the court rules or the Court Program in case get dismissed, the next step is determining how the case is resolved. I think in listening to what this legislation is proposing at the Committee Meeting twice, what i like about it is really and it doesnt really as other supervisors have reported now, its not about whether or not our jails are overcrowded at this point. Its matter of for those that are deemed not necessary immediate threat and it goes through a process that they could get be reintroduced to the community as soon as possible and for them to be away for a length of time could do more damage than not and yet, theyre going to be more in this Monitoring System so theyre and i ask the question whats the track ....
just problematic that any entity can do /tphaet donate. it seems to be a big loophole that i didn t realize existed. this is not anything on what the da done. this is just my overall feeling about the way state law operates. i think it s problematic and i hope with can have a bigger discussion about this. i will be supporting this today. it is legal under state law so i won t disagree with that. just a last comment. when i first got on the board of supervisors, it was during the budget committee /-fp we had a handful of items that were retro active accept and expends and we took exception to those. that s why i brought it up right now. we have a trend that s happening now. proliferation of retro active accept and expends that i think we should tighten up moving forward. this is one of em. this is one that pains me more than others. i think it s important to point out. any further discussion? let s take a vote. item 15 supervisor chiu, i; cohen i, farrell i, kim i ....