Earlier today, less than five points from the s p 500 taking on a new high. Not quite making a mark at the close. It is worth noting, the brutal shownbeneath the s p 500. Y that 200 Day Moving Average if the s p 500 cap climbed higher, we could see more choppy now,ng, but 20 up right on pays for the best year since 2013. For me, it is about the bond market. The 10 year and thirtyyear year yields rising five basis points, meaning that twos and yield curve is steeping, a five or six level. Today we are getting that classic risk on fuel with yields rising, steepening that curve. The trend has been different if we look at a weekly view. Come into my terminal here on tlt, longduration third this on news the Largest Bond Fund flows, the highest level going back to since april, so tot now has a record amount of shares outstanding, highlighting in the past week or so, huge demand for highgrade bonds. It feels like people have been predicting the next recession basically since the last recessio
And last second. Up by at russell 2000 better than 2 and it has and it is ent years getting its own. 2 on the ent to 10year which is not a big move, be going crazy saying we should sell equities. To market is really trying figure out where the he can equilibrium s any given day. We will be fighting that until liquidity into the system. There is a t it in, six to ninemonth lag so that is is a next year when there pretty powerful equity blowoff be use people will just moving in aggressively at that point. Back but we will come pwabg first lets dive deeper into the action of the close. Im looking at what you were talking about small cap anding a ut rally up three days in row up more than 5 and back to january. It is pretty sunny. An last time the russell had see ime high last year we the down trend and russell 2,000 to get out of its own way. We looked at there last week or as it was week starting to go above the 200 day average. Look at this. Popping above down trend but did that earlier
And explicit but based on facts and circumstances the day with had the board upheld the prior decision the decision isnt a pure question of law but what is happening at the site and since there mr. Tail as wrapped up the ductwork in the light well as she requested and before that no mitigation measures taken. As i read the brief their initial installation b be less than 58 dp and from that point on never complied in my mind its not been actually come employed with the directions from the inspector. So. Talking about the 58 decimals in the light well. Im not sure by according to the briefs that came before me it had never the permit holder never got the d b down to 58 thats why mr. Tail had been in compliance since 2010. It specific question id like to ask the noise officer thats here to address it and okay. Thank you. Hi jonathan from the north control officer from the dph i can tell you that that was that equipment has always been in compliance based on the measurements ive seen from
Wrapped up the ductwork in the light well as she requested and before that no mitigation measures taken. As i read the brief their initial installation b be less than 58 dp and from that point on never complied in my mind its not been actually come employed with the directions from the inspector. So. Talking about the 58 decimals in the light well. Im not sure by according to the briefs that came before me it had never the permit holder never got the d b down to 58 thats why mr. Tail had been in compliance since 2010. It specific question id like to ask the noise officer thats here to address it and okay. Thank you. Hi jonathan from the north control officer from the dph i can tell you that that was that equipment has always been in compliance based on the measurements ive seen from my predecessors with regards to the commercial industrial noise on that the 8 decimals over the ambient i dont know it thats in compliance on the rooftop because like ms. Kaiser said it was not assessable u
On never complied in my mind its not been actually come employed with the directions from the inspector. So. Talking about the 58 decimals in the light well. Im not sure by according to the briefs that came before me it had never the permit holder never got the d b down to 58 thats why mr. Tail had been in compliance since 2010. It specific question id like to ask the noise officer thats here to address it and okay. Thank you. Hi jonathan from the north control officer from the dph i can tell you that that was that equipment has always been in compliance based on the measurements ive seen from my predecessors with regards to the commercial industrial noise on that the 8 decimals over the ambient i dont know it thats in compliance on the rooftop because like ms. Kaiser said it was not assessable until i came on board a couple of years later when we figured that out but you can tell you we did the people forming took measurements inside her unit under the most stricken that migrant. So t