something in your testimony that was important to me and that is this seems simple but the idea that if people want to hurt them several selves have to hang up and call another. you said you are going to fix that and hit a key and make it work. i want to know when so i can get a date and call the number. by november or december. one of the things we have been working closely with the veterans crisis line. we don t want to overstretch that system i just want a date so if it isn t there by november or december because i agree with the guy that stood up in the back it is just great to keep hearing you will all do work but from where i sit, the actual accomplishment of the job is not happening. so hopefully there is a number we can hit. i have people calling. i will yield back. mr. waltz, minnesota. thank you to the chairman and thank you for being here. the osi implemented in minneapolis and we have followed this and are getting results. i know this is something knew
what has your healthcare been like. is it better? dial in. you can also send us a tweet at c-span wj or facebook or e-mail us at c-span.org. yesterday on capitol hill they held a hearing with secretary silvia burrwell to talk about the law and the supreme court decision on whether or not subsidies were meant for all exchanges or just those established by the state. during that hearing, lawmakers went back and forth about whether or not the law was working. here s what the chairman had to say. paul ryan republican of wisconsin. paul ryan: any objective observer would say this law is on the fritz. the whole point of obamacare was make healthcare more affordable. premiums are going up, way up, all over the country and insurers are proposing double digit premium increases. 30% and tennessee 36%, south dakota 42%, tax season was like a bad dream before and now it s a total nightmare. people could never afford these plans on their own so the law gave them subsidies. now two-thirds
but we ve seen a lot of very common cancers like that and we ve also seen some very rare type cancers and oftentimes, from an epidemiological basis that can be interesting, about the rare cancers. mr. burgess: sure. and that speaks to the value of having people with the expertise in treating the injuries encountered because an uncommon cancer can be a difficult diagnosis at which to arrive. dr. howard: exactly. and if this were distributed we would not this if this group were distributed, it would be hard to find those rare cancers if the patients were not seen in our clinical centers and rather they were seeing their own personal physicians throughout the united states. it would be very difficult to do that. mr. burgess: it provides a focus that otherwise would not be available. just a brief comment on the observed versus the expected cancer rates of the population that you re following, is this number, i guess i calculate it to be 6% based on the number of patients you re
partnership. do you support free trade in a general? if you are opposed to what is going on there is a number for you to call. you can make comments via social media via twitter facebook and you can send an e-mail. here is the hill newspaper. vicki needham is a reporter. guest: it looks like they re going to vote on three of bills. two votes are huge. the first is on trade adjustment assistance which is a democratic irony. they started to revolt on that guest day. they are not happy with what was going on and they are seeing this as a way to stop the trade promotion authority bill, which will probably be the second the vote of the day. if it passes, they can move on to tpa. if either bill fails, it will stop all of the trade bills. host: you have a whip count. you go through all of the members of congress and list how they are voting. currently, what is your count? guest: i think we are still at three dozen or so democrats who are undecided and right now we re looking at th
that says they re going to be implementing the program, new york has announced that they ll operate the basic health program starting in january of 2016. new york has estimated that they ll receive $2.5 billion, b, billion. how is this possible since the money has never been appropriated? in other words, what extra constitutional authority are you invoking that allows you to spend money that s not been appropriated? with regard to the issue of 1311 and where that is, i think 131 1 is about states that want to choose and try to do what thins and ways that seek flexibility. and that s what we do is try to work with states when they do that. with regard to the authority both for the cost sharing issue in 1311, in the budget appendix, it s the place where we believe the authorities lie. but there s been no appropriation. you ll acknowledge that, won t you? with regard to the authorities there, what we believe is the authorities for the aptc are the authorities because tha