good on them. he made some good lines in it. he s not a natural speaker, he s not a brilliant, engaging orator but he comes across as a competent, steady character. he told a good story about his own background and his own past and family, which i thought was very effective. he repudiated the last manifesto, which i thought was a sensible thing to do, given how it was defeated. he told the labour party, well, if you hate boris johnson, bear in mind that he beat you, so look at yourselves which is valid point to make, and he also tried to bring back and reconnect the party that won elections under tony blair by arguing that if you want to look at levelling up which, of course, is borisjohnson s big phrase he argued that the last labour government actually did a lot of levelling up. so overall, i think it was a sort of b+, competent, good, could have been a lot worse, hasn t changed the game, hasn t answered a lot of contradictions facing the labour party of how to web together the
to have people heckling there didn t look very good on them. he made some good lines, he s not a natural speaker, he s not a brilliant, engaging orator but he comes across as a competent, steady character. he told a good story about his own background and his own past and family, which i thought was very effective. he repudiated the last manifesto, which i thought was a sensible thing to do given how it was defeated. he told the labour party, well, if you hate borisjohnson, bear in mind that he beat you, so look at yourself, which is valid point to make. he also tried to bring back and reconnect the party that won elections under tony blair by arguing that if you want to look at levelling up, which of course is borisjohnson s big phrase, he argued that the last labour government actually did a lot of levelling up. so overall, i think it was a b+, competent, good, could have been a lot worse, hasn t changed the game, hasn t answered a lot of contradictions facing the labour party of h
good, could have been a lot worse, hasn t changed the game, hasn t answered a lot of contradictions facing the labour party of how to web together the various elements within the labour party. but keir starmer reasserted his own authority and stamped a little bit of his character. underlying the fact that he sees himself as a serious player up against what he calls a trivial prime minister. thank you for that. thomas, do you think it s changed the game? i think it has. for one thing, i agree with ian that he is a totally different beast, starmer. he is against theatricality, the hallmark of a lot of british policy production and performance. he is serious, down to earth and he means business. and this is not the time where you want actors on the stage parading themselves as johnson has successfully done over the last few months in his term in office. you want a sober guy like keir starmer who is not charismatic or anything which will help them to get his message across. and johnson wil
and his own past and family, which i thought was very effective. he repudiated the last manifesto, which i thought was a sensible thing to do given how it was defeated. he told the labour party, well, if you hate borisjohnson, bear in mind that he beat you, so look at yourself, which is valid point to make. he also tried to bring back and reconnect the party that won elections under tony blair by arguing that if you want to look at levelling up, which of course is borisjohnson s big phrase, he argued that the last labour government actually did a lot of levelling up. so overall, i think it was a b+, competent, good, could have been a lot worse, hasn t changed the game, hasn t answered a lot of contradictions facing the labour party of how to web together the various elements within the labour party. but keir starmer reasserted his own authority and stamped a little bit of his character. underlying the fact that he sees himself as a serious player up against what he calls a trivial pr
to get a lot worse, has it changed again, hasn t answered a lot of contradictions facing the labour party of how to web together the various elements within the labour party. but keir starmer reasserted his own authority and stamped a little bit of his character. underlying the fact that he sees himself as a serious player up against what he calls a trivial prime minister. against what he calls a trivial prime minister. ., ,, , ., ., ., prime minister. thank you for that. thomas, prime minister. thank you for that. thomas. do prime minister. thank you for that. thomas. do you prime minister. thank you for that. thomas, do you think prime minister. thank you for that. thomas, do you think it s prime minister. thank you for that. thomas, do you think it s changed l thomas, do you think it s changed the game? thomas, do you think it s changed the game? i think it has. for one thing i the game? i think it has. for one thing i agree with ian that he is a total thing i agree with