Care home sector meeting Government officials over mandatory jabs for staff pressandjournal.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pressandjournal.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Notice: Undefined index: HTTP USER AGENT in
/home/legalease/legalbusiness/releases/20210224120424/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare-pro/lib/social-networks/SWP Whatsapp.php on line
49
/home/legalease/legalbusiness/releases/20210224120424/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare-pro/lib/social-networks/SWP Whatsapp.php on line
49
/home/legalease/legalbusiness/releases/20210224120424/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare-pro/lib/social-networks/SWP Whatsapp.php on line
49
/home/legalease/legalbusiness/releases/20210224120424/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare-pro/lib/social-networks/SWP Whatsapp.php on line
49
/home/legalease/legalbusiness/releases/20210224120424/wp-content/plugins/social-warfare-pro/lib/social-networks/SWP Whatsapp.php on line
49
In a
judgment handed down this morning, six justices unanimously dismissed Uber’s appeal against a 2018 Court of Appeal ruling. The company argued that drivers are independent contractors who work under contracts made with customers.
In
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, the Supreme Court disagreed, finding there was no factual basis for asserting that Uber London acted merely as an agent for drivers. Instead, it found that Uber London contracts with passengers and engages drivers to carry out bookings for it.
It added that the service performed by drivers and offered to passengers through the Uber app is very tightly defined and controlled by Uber.