lake, i was 100 percent with. emily: yes! yes! jesse: it was a bong hit. bret: thank you, jesse. good evening. i m bret baier. breaking tonight. we have new polling on the republican presidential race in iowa showing former president donald trump making it a one horse race with a growing lead on the competition. in iowa, with just three and a half weeks to go before the caucuses, a fox business survey finds former president trump 34 points ahead of his nearest competitor. and there is substantial fallout this evening in iowa and elsewhere for the breaking news story we brought you last night. the ruling by colorado state supreme court that the former president is not qualified to be on that state s ballot because the court labels him an insurrectionist. a term pine used today as well. we have fox team coverage. david spunt is at the white house. president biden defines the polls talking up bidenomics and calling out predecessor reacting to that colorado ruling. we begin
states supreme court. we begin tonight with investigation news. the latest legal development of the day is the news that donald trump has launched another delay tactic. in special prosecutor, jack smith, federal grand jury investigation of donald trump s activities leading up to an on january 6th, and attempting to overturn the last presidential election. in a sealed legal filing, donald trump is appealing a federal judges order in washington d. c. for donald trump s white house staff to testify. to jack smith s grand jury. the order, the judges order, requires donald trump s last white house chief of staff, mark meadows, to testify to the grand jury. along with donald trump s last director of national intelligence, john ratcliffe, and donald trump s last national security adviser, robert o brien. along with other trump white house officials, the trump appeal is trying to claim executive privilege. to block that testimony, we are always lucky when we have neal katyal appearin
He s a member of the senate judiciary committee, and an unrelenting pest about ethics in our judicial system, especially the ethics of the united states supreme court. senator, congratulations. you have taken, force them to take, one small step in the direction the way you all live in the senate, with financial disclosure and transparency, transparency about gifts, or any sort of, you know, contributions you get. what are we going to learn now that we could not learn before? well, the justices aren t supposed to get gifts of hospitality and not reported it. there is an exception for that for personal hospitality. if you visit your daughter and son-in-law for a holiday, for instance, they had undertaken the practice of taking that
this is what the republicans have been working toward the state for decades. they ve been out there plotting, carefully cultivating a supreme court justices so they could have a majority on the bench. that would accomplish something that the majority of americans do not want. we have a right. extremists, we ve heard enough from the extremists. and we re tired of it. as for the republicans, though we have absolutely no idea which side, or who really came from. they re all about hunting down and exposing the leaker. the integrity and independence of the supreme court is once again under attack. i think the justices aren t taking this seriously. and we will find the leaker. if you will start down, do you see a need for federal
Gave a main role versus away the law of the land. they need to do it. i ve never seen you so angry? this is what the republicans have been working toward the state for decades. they ve been out there plotting, carefully cultivating a supreme court justices so they could have a majority on the bench. that would accomplish something that the majority of americans do not want. we have a right. extremists, we ve heard enough from the extremists. and we re tired of it. as for the republicans, though we have absolutely no idea which side, or who really came from. they re all about hunting down and exposing the leaker. the integrity and independence of the supreme court is once again under attack. i think the justices aren t taking this seriously. and we will find the leaker. if you will start down, do