High Court further stated that the inter-faith couple can maintain live-in relationship but marriage will not be valid and their children will not have any right on parental property and it will not be registered.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has iterated that the surrendering of an accused is not necessary before preferring a criminal revision application under Section 397 CrPC.The single-judge bench of.
According to the separation agreement, the husband was allegedly obligated to provide maintenance of ₹2,000 with an annual increment of 10 percent to his wife and children and allocate one acre of agricultural land.
Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently held that when the husband has taken a step back from the promises made in the agreement to live separately, then it can t be said that the wife is living.
Noting that the appellants who sought anticipatory bail had been given notice under Section 41-A CrPC, the Madhya Pradesh High Court observed that there was no necessity to grant the relief of.