ask them if they had familiarity with guns. that would give you an idea whether they were gun owners. that could be argued that way. some of them, there was evidence they were not gun owners. they had experience shooting maybe with friends and family members. but to your point a moment ago. we learned that once the jury, the 18 people were there. we heard about the msnbc situation where they were followed in their jury van. what the people don t know in this country is prior to that. a week before, we learned that joe citizen, whoever that may have been was at the location where these jurors met with the van and was taking video of these jurors. and as you can understand, judge schroeder was beyond
ask them if they had familiarity with guns. that would give you an idea whether they were gun owners. that could be argued that way. some of them, there was evidence they were not gun owners. they had experience shooting maybe with friends and family members. but to your point a moment ago. we learned that once the jury, the 18 people were there. we heard about the msnbc situation where they were followed in their jury van. what the people don t know in this country is prior to that. a week before, we learned that joe citizen, whoever that may have been was at the location where these jurors met with the van and was taking video of these jurors. and as you can understand, judge schroeder was beyond
ask them if they had familiarity with guns. that would give you an idea whether they were gun owners. that could be argued that way. some of them, there was evidence they were not gun owners. they had experience shooting maybe with friends and family members. but to your point a moment ago. we learned that once the jury, the 18 people were there. we heard about the msnbc situation where they were followed in their jury van. what the people don t know in this country is prior to that. a week before, we learned that joe citizen, whoever that may have been was at the location where these jurors met with the van and was taking video of these jurors. and as you can understand, judge schroeder was beyond
purpose of publicizing who those jurors are, exactly what contributes to people going after jurors. violence in the streets, insurrection in the court, that we need to prevent, and nbc does not have their story straight. told by a supervisor to follow the bus, nbc trying to distance from this. producers are aggressive people, i know them. their job is to report the news. it is inconceivable he was following the bus for just the fun of it. he was going there for the purpose of recording, and nbc news explained what that meant and he needs to talk and talk publicly. sean: let s get your take, joe concha. i want to jump on what ari just said. nbc s attempt to explain this way as far as following that jury van is about the best unintentional comedy out there. take away, please, just for a moment, republican, democrat, or conservative, liberal, sane, insane.
jury box. laura: now nbc responded by saying, well, the traffic violation took place near the jury van. the freelancer never contacted or intended to contact the jurors during deliberation and never photographed or intended to photograph them. now, does anyone actually believe that? in msnbc journalist telling the jury box, what, for fun? the police observed him gunning through a red light to keep up with the bus. does that sound like someone caught in the wrong place at the wrong time? kurt, seems pretty obvious this was a mistake. as an attorney, what does this do to the jury and to the validity of these deliberations? well, you know, laura, this has gone from a tragedy to farce.