major develop moons, congress passed a bill giving 14.3 billion in aid to israel, but joe biden threatened to veto it because it does not include money for a cause that is already defeated sadly in ukraine. israeli prime minister netanyahu today says that nothing is going to stop them from going into gaza and getting the job done and now gaza city is surrounded. we re seeing explosions across the night sky. a live report from the ground later in the show. but first, loving china, hating us, the focus of tonight s angle. preparations for the date are underway. what is he going to wear? how long will the conversations last? who is better at small talk? the president is looking forward to meeting with president xi. will not get details about this meeting that is going to happen this month in san francisco. it will be a constructive meeting. laura: constructive for whom, jp morgan, goldman sachs? not the american people. xi does not meet with foreign leaders unless he s prepa
i want them now. hannity and tonight album brags while crowning t political show trial is almost over. the closing arguments are in the bookris arguments, and soon 12 jurors selected from one of the most anti trump districts in theanti entire country. they will decide the fate of donaltr d trump pending appeal. now, today, the prosecution asked jurors to throw caution to the wind, convict the former president of a crimer that they were never able to explain, let alone prove it. le tn in fact, bragg wants the y to hand down 34 felony convictionyut 3s. based on what we have been h saying from the beginning. the l theory surroundingding a a misdemeanor document labeling allegation well past l the statute of limitationsab upcharge to a felony because of this mysterious election lawr violation that was never charged or prosecuteio d evere in a anywhere in america. and this entire convolutedme ca relies on one witness, a convicted liarconvic, admitted liar, disbarred lawyer by th
if you re saying if that was the case. i m just saying what we ought to look at is what we have before us. the fbi, the department of justice had grave concern, number one, number two, we don t know what was presented in the fisa application, that s number two. number three, we ve got to give those judges credit and the agents that went before it, and the renewals that went on. all i m saying, i don t want to speak for other democrats or republicans, as an attorney i m just saying this, you ve got to look at what s before you and you ve got to give those jury t juryis juryists, instead of saying they were given a paper. neil: you re working under the assumption, a good lawyer, that they re not going just something on a dossier that was politically motivated and by the democratic party. you re hoping that s the case, if it were the assumptions by you and i, because there was no bipartisan