he put out about a computer search never brought up at the trial. we were waiting for the state to bring it up and when they didn t we were shocked. only looked at the internet explorer search engine. they missed looked at another one, firefox. jose knew there was a search for full proof suffocation. a search made on june 16th, 2008. the same day kaylee anthony vanished. how do you think that evidence might have changed things at trial? it would have been a powerful piece of evidence firefighter the state. if that came out in the trial, you might have had a different outcome. one more piece of evidence or
the florida sheriff s office now admitting it overlooked a computer search, one that everyone agrees could have been crucial to the prosecution. police say their investigator missed an internet search for foolproof suffocation methods. the search was done by someone in the anthony home on june 16th, 2008. that s the last day 2-year-old caylee anthony was seen alive. the bombshell is of course rising lots of questions. who did the search? why didn t the evidence get to prosecutors? the burning question, could the evidence have changed the verdict in former lapd detective mark fuhrman joining us. good evening, sir. good evening, greta. greta: i can t imagine anything more damming than that computer search on the last day the child was seen. i m curious, how does this get overlooked? i have no idea. you would think, you have a child that s missing, whether she s kidnapped or you suspect she s been murdered, she is missing on a certain day, and that s where it should start,
the florida sheriff s office now admitting it overlooked a computer search, one that everyone agrees could have been crucial to the prosecution. police say their investigator missed an internet search for foolproof suffocation methods. the search was done by someone in the anthony home on june 16th, 2008. that s the last day 2-year-old caylee anthony was seen alive. the bombshell is of course rising lots of questions. who did the search? why didn t the evidence get to prosecutors? the burning question, could the evidence have changed the verdict in former lapd detective mark fuhrman joining us. good evening, sir. good evening, greta. greta: i can t imagine anything more damming than that computer search on the last day the child was seen. i m curious, how does this get overlooked? i have no idea. you would think, you have a child that s missing, whether she s kidnapped or you suspect she s been murdered, she is missing on a certain day, and that s where it should start,
arthel: right now the casey anthony case back in the spotlight. the big question being asked, did the prosecution drop the bomb. a bombshell report coming out of orlando says prosecutors and police overlooked anthony s google searches and quote fool-proof suffocation, a possible smoking gun that could have doomed the mother of caylee anthony who was found not guilty of her child s murder. the findings in this report seem to be backed up by claims made by anthony s own defense lawyer, jose baez. he first dropped that bombshell this past summer in his book on the case. fred tice, and dan shore, both attorneys, good to see both of you. this is unbelievable. this google search by the way took place on june 16th, 2008
no one called 911 for a month. how in the world can a mother wait 30 days before ever reporting her child missing? it s insane. it s bizarre. something s just not right about that. well the answer is actually relatively simple. she never was missing. caylee anthony died on june 16th, 2008, when she drowned in her family s swimming pool. reporter: prosecutors said, among their key evidence was what they said was the stench of death coming from casey s car, a smell even george and cindy anthony choked on before dialing 911. it smells like there s been a dead body in the damned car. what do you believe the smell was from? truthfully i don t know. she wants to believe caylee was back there, i don t want to believe that.