SB200, a proposed bill currently in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, would authorize the production and medical use of psilocybin in the state.
covering. jumping ahead, since i ve got you here, the fact he signed the president up for a nondisclosure agreement using his signature, at least david dennison, aka, now trump says he didn t know anything about it. one of them is not telling the truth. for sure. i should say the president isn t telling the truth. they re not. can a lawyer sign somebody up for a contract without their permission? no, and not without communicating with their client about what they re planning to do. it s not realistic. we have to have, be realistic about the facts then decide what do we do. how would the president at the time when he signed this deal with a client know he wasn t supposed to talk b about the affair with stormy daniels? has anybody brought that up? yeah. i think we re obliged to do something under a krot. both parties, don t talk about it under this agreement.
accountable, other than a special prosecutor is not a bad idea. but if that s the case, if it is not a special prosecutor tseems to me, it has to be somebody that the republicans and the in thees in the house and the senate who are concerned about this, and with good reason, ought to be able to nod and say, fair enough, they will do a decent job. jumping ahead, this may be a criminal action, may not. there is a lot to be learned and discovered about this. what should happen to someone who does leak like this? what should we do with someone like this? they can be prosecuted criminally for breaching security classifications. if it is not against the law. suppose for whatever reason, this is an a gray area where there isn t a law that might cover it, precisely. what should happen? you are the lawyer, greta! but it may not be a legal issue. it may not be a legal issue. i mean, we have sent people to jail for for violating
accountable, other than a special prosecutor is not a bad idea. but if that s the case, if it is not a special prosecutor tseems to me, it has to be somebody that the republicans and the in thees in the house and the senate who are concerned about this, and with good reason, ought to be able to nod and say, fair enough, they will do a decent job. jumping ahead, this may be a criminal action, may not. there is a lot to be learned and discovered about this. what should happen to someone who does leak like this? what should we do with someone like this? they can be prosecuted criminally for breaching security classifications. if it is not against the law. suppose for whatever reason, this is an a gray area where there isn t a law that might cover it, precisely. what should happen? you are the lawyer, greta! but it may not be a legal issue. it may not be a legal issue. i mean, we have sent people to jail for for violating